Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Natural disasters have a common place in human history. Disasters of different types can occur and affect human lives, their materials, belongings, livestock etc. With the growth of science and technology, the possibilities to identify and detect such natural and undesired events have increased to a large extent. Concepts such as artificial intelligence and database management systems can be used together with impunity to predict, prevent, minimize, and store better preventive results for customized improvements. In this exploratory research, we have tried to observe how some of the prominent disasters have impacted the population in India’s past history. We have also tried to create a flowchart and mathematical model as a suggestive model that can be implemented for future use in disaster related scenarios. This paper points to a new suggestive model for disaster recovery management that is actually needed in realistic situations. This paper can be used by academicians, researchers, disaster relief groups and government agencies for disaster relief management systems.

Keywords

Disaster; Deaths; Intelligence; Database; Information

1. Ashish, N., Eguchi, R. & Hegde, R. (2007). Situational awareness technologies for disaster response. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-71613-8_24.
2. Balakirsky, S., Carpin, S., Kleiner, A., Lewis, M., Visser, A., Wang, J., & Ziparo, V. A. (2007). Towards heterogeneous robot teams for disaster mitigation: Results and performance metrics from robocup rescue. Journal of Field Robotics, 24(11-12), 943-967.
3. Bloodsworth, P., & Greenwood, S. (2005). COSMOA an ontology-centric multi-agent systems for coordinating medical responses to large-scale disasters. In M. Lytras (Ed.), Semantic Web Factbook – 2005 Edition, 1st edition, AIS SIGSEMIS and Open Research Society Publications, ISSN: 1556-2301, May 2006.
4. Boersma, K. & Fonio, C. (2018). Big data, surveillance and crisis management. London & New York: Routledge.
5. E-Response Project (2006). e-Response - University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from www.aiai.ed.ac.uk.
6. Hyogo Framework for Action (2005-2015). Retrieved from https://www.unisdr.org/files/ 18197_midterm.pdf.
7. Imran, M., Castillo, C., Lucas, J., Meier, P., & Vieweg, S. (2014). AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response. In WWWW ’14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 159–162). Seoul: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2567948.2577034.
8. Maguire, B. & Hagan, P. (2007). Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(2), 16-20.
9. Massaguer, V. B., Mehrotra, S. & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2006). Multi-agent simulation of disaster response. Retrieved from https://www.ics.uci.edu/~dsm/papers/ 2006/multiagent06.pdf.
10. Schlenoff, E. M. (2005). A robot ontology for urban search and rescue. Proceedings of the 2005 CIKM conference: Workshop on Research in Knowledge Representation for Autonomous Systems, October 31 – November 5, 2005, Bremen, Germany.
11. Shah, B. & Choset, H. (2003). In C. H. Lee, & Y. K. Kwak (Eds.), Survey on urban search and rescue robotics. Pittsburgh, PA: CMU, 15213.
12. The Economist (2017). Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/29/weather-related-disasters-are-increasing.
13. Wolff, J. G. (2006). Medical diagnosis as pattern recognition in a framework of information compression by multiple alignment, unification and search. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 608-625.