Journal Press India®

Remote Work is the New Normal: Virtual Teams as a Prerequisite in Global Business Strategy

Vol 9 , Issue 1 , January - June 2022 | Pages: 79-104 | Review paper  

Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Subhanjali Chopra, Associate Professor, Commerce, Sri Aurobindo College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India (
2. Meenakshi Chaudhary, Associate Professor, Commerce, Sri Aurobindo College, Janakpuri, Delhi, India (

The world has changed, and with it comes the obligation for us to adjust ourselves to what is truly normal for our organizations. Organizations today rely heavily on a geographically dispersed workforce to compete in the global economy. They establish teams that offer the greatest functional expertise from around the world coupled with deep, local knowledge of the most exciting areas. Despite virtual teams’ growing prevalence, relatively little is known about this new form of work team, particularly in most developing nations. The objective of the paper is to identify the antecedents of virtual team performance and critically examine the literature to filter the advantages and pitfalls of virtual teams. For this purpose, we conducted a search in Google Scholar with the keywords ‘virtual team performance’ and ‘determinants of virtual teams performance’. Given the ease with which the technological infrastructure required to support virtual teams is now available, more research into the wide range of difficulties surrounding virtual teams is required if we are to understand how to manage them effectively. 


Virtual teams; Trust; Cohesion; Communication; Leadership; Performance

  1. Ahuja, J. (2016). Modelling the success factors of virtual team. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(48), 1-9.
  2. Ahuja, M. K. & Carley, K. M. (1999). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 741-757.
  3. Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J. & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2558–2580.
  4. Archer, N. P. (1990). A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 9(4), 307-317.
  5. Bergiel, J. B., Bergiel, E. B. & Balsmeier, P. W. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31(2), 99-110.
  6. Bergiel, J. B., Bergiel, E. B., & Balsmeier, P. W. (2006). The reality of virtual teams. Competition Forum Indiana, 4(2), 427-432.
  7. Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345–381.
  8. Bhat, S. K., Neerja, P. & Ahuja, V. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: An empirical study using SEM. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 33-41.
  9. Birgit, G. & Ulrike, B. (2017). Why virtual teams work – state of the art. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 297-305.
  10. Borget, A., Anoye, J., & Kouamé, S. (2018). Leadership challenges in virtual team environment. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(7), 160-167.
  11. Burke, K. & Aytes, K. (1998). A longitudinal analysis of the effects of media richness on cohesion development and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1, 135-144.
  12. Burlea, A. S. (2007). The communication process in virtual teams. Informatica Economică, 1(41), 113-116.
  13. Cascio, W. F. & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 362-376.
  14. Cascio, W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 81-90.
  15. Catherine, M. R., Gefen, D. & Bay, A. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 271–295.
  16. Chidambaram, L. & Bostrom, R. (1993). Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(4), 443-469.
  17. Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143-163.
  18. Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R. P. & Wynne, B. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 7-25.
  19. Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., Manheim, W. & Beth, M. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279-306.
  20. Couch, L. L. & Jones, W. H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(3), 319–336
  21. Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B. S. (2003). Transferring R&D Knowledge: The Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 39-68. Retrieved from
  22. Cummings, L. L. & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 302-330. Retrieved from
  23. Davison, C. & Ward, K. (1999). Leading international teams. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill International.
  24. Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575-600.
  25. Dulebohna, J. H. & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569–574.
  26. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S. & Taha, Z. (2009). Innovation and R&D activities in virtual team. European Journal of Scientific Research, 34(3), 297-307.
  27. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S. & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 2653-2669.
  28. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S. & Taha, Z. (2010). Benefits and pitfalls of virtual R&D teams: An empirical study. Retrieved from Benefits_and_Pitfalls_of_Virtual_R_and_D_Teams_An_Empirical_Study.
  29. Ebrahim, N. A., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2011). Virtual teams and management challenges. Academic Leadership Journal, 9(3), 1-7.
  30. Ertuðrul, U. (2012). Virtual environment interpersonal trust scale validity and reliability study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 393-402.
  31. Ertug˘rul, U., Korkmaz, Ö. & Kurt, I. (2014). The examination of individuals’ virtual loneliness states in internet addiction and virtual environments in terms of inter-personal trust levels. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 214–224. Retrieved from
  32. Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). An assessment of group support systems experiment research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7–149.
  33. Furumo, K., Pillis, E. D.  & Buxton, M. (2012). The impact of leadership on participation and trust in virtual teams. SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People Research, 123–126. Retrieved from
  34. Galegher, J. & Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: an experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 110-138.
  35. Garro-Abarca, V., Pedro, P. S., & Mariano, A. C. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. Retrieved from
  36. Gassmann, O. & Zedtwitz, M. V. (2003). Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 243-262.
  37. Gaudes, A., Hamilton-Bogart, B., Marsh, S. & Robinson, H. (2007). A framework for constructing effective virtual teams. The Journal of E-Working, 1(2), 83-97.
  38. Gerda, M., Kandela, Õ., & Türk, K. (2009). Virtual work and its challenges and types. Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), 2(2), 96-103.
  39. Gonçalves, P., Ferreira, L., Gonçalves, J., Putnik, G. D., & Cruz-Cunha, M. M. (2014). Direct communication versus virtual communication in virtual teams. Procedia Technology, 16, 3–10. Retrieved from S2212017314002898.
  40. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E. & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121–173.
  41. Guinea, O. D. A., Webster, J. & Staples, S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the virtual teams literature, Symposium on high performance professional teams, industrial relations centre, School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada.
  42. Harasim, L. M. (1993). Global networks: Computers and international communication. London, England: The MIT Press.
  43. Hertel, G. T., Geister, S. & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69–95.
  44. Hinds, P. J. & Bailey, D. E. (2000). Virtual teams: Anticipating the impact of viruality on team process and performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2000(1). Retrieved from
  45. Hossain, L. & Wigand, R. T. (2004). ICT enabled virtual collaboration through trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 22-31.
  46. Hungwei, T. & Heng, Y. K. (2011). The relationships between trust, performance, satisfaction, and development progressions among virtual teams. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 81-94.
  47. Hunsaker, P. L. & Hunsaker, J. S. (2008). Virtual teams: A leader’s guide. Team Performance Management, 14(1/2), 86-101.
  48. Ives, B. & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1991). Applications of global information technology: Key issues for management. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 33–49.
  49. Jang, C. Y. (2009). Facilitating trust in virtual teams: The role of awareness. Competition Forum, 7(2), 399-408.
  50. Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(6), 791-815.
  51. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K. & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.
  52. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
  53. Johnson, M. W. & Suskewicz, J. (2020). Does your company have a long-term plan for remote work? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from
  54. Jolanta, A., Walker, R. & Cardon, P. W. (2017). Media use in virtual teams of varying levels of coordination. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 1-21.
  55. Kangning, W. (2007). Sharing knowledge in global virtual teams how do chinese team members perceive the impact of national cultural differences on knowledge sharing? International Federation for Information Processing, AMCIS Proceedings, 394.
  56. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. & Wei, K. K. (2006). Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 237-274.
  57. Kayworth, T. R. & Leidner, D. E. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18(2), 183–194.
  58. Kayworth, T. R. & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 7-40.
  59. Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 715–726.
  60. Khalil, S. (2017). Investigating the factors that influence virtual teams’ performance within the United Arab Emirates using IMOI model. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8(1), 10-17.
  61. Khawaja, K. F. (2015). Examining the role of trust in virtual environment for knowledge exchange: A study on Pakistani Universities. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(10), 192-198.
  62. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 96–123.
  63. Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700-718.
  64. Kratzer, J., Leenders, R.,  & Engelen, J. V.  (2005). Keeping virtual R & D teams creative. Research Technology Management, 48(2), 13-16. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2005.11657300, 13-16.
  65. Leenders R. T. A. J., Engelen, J. M. L. V.,  & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1), 69–92.
  66. Lind M. R. (1999). The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(4), 276-285.
  67. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: People working boundaries with technology. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  68. Lloyd, P. (1994). Groupware in the 21st century: computer supported cooperative working toward the millennium. In peter lloyd. Journal of the American Society for Information Science; New York, N.Y, 46(9).
  69. Lurey, J. & Raisinhgani, M. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 8(8), 523-544.
  70. Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., & Lott, V. (2001). Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 229-249.
  71. Martinez-Sanchez, A., Perez-Perez, M.,  De-Luis-Carnicer, P., & Vela-Jimenez, M. J. (2006). Teleworking and new product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 202-214.
  72. Maznevski, M. L., .& Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space overtime: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organisation Science, 11(5), 473–492.
  73. Mitzi, M., Montoya-Weiss, A., Massey, P. & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262.
  74. Mogale, L., & Sutherland, M. (2010). Managing virtual teams in multinational companies. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 34(2), 7-24.
  75. Morrison‑Smith, S. & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1-33.
  76. Mulebeke, J. A. W. & Zheng, L.  (2006). Incorporating integrated product development with technology road mapping for dynamism and innovation. International Journal of Product Development, 3(1), 56-76.
  77. Nydegger, R., & Nydegger, L. (2010). Challenges in managing virtual teams. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 8(3), 69-82.
  78. Ojasalo, J. (2008). Management of innovation networks: A case study of different approaches. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(1), 51-86.
  79. Paul, S. P., Seetharaman, I. S., & Mykytyn, J. P. (2005). Understanding conflict in virtual teams: An experimental investigation using content analysis. 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
  80. Pauleen, D. J. (2003). An inductively derived model of leader-initiated relationship building with virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3), 227-256.
  81. Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.
  82. Piccoli, G., Powell, A. & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology and People, 17(4) 359-379.
  83. Powell, A., Piccoli, G. & Ives, B. (2004). A review of current literature and directions for future research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6-36.
  84. Qureshi, S. S. & Vogel, D. (2001). Adaptiveness in virtual teams: Organisational challenges and research, Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 27-46. Retrieved from
  85. Rad, P. F. & Levin, G. (2003). Achieving project management success using virtual teams. Florida: J. Ross Publishing.
  86. Ramesh, V., & Dennis, A. R. (2002). The object-oriented team: lessons for virtual teams from global software development. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 212-221. Retrieved from doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.993876.
  87. Rice, D. J., Davidson, B. D., Dannenhoffer, J. F. & Gay, G. K. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of virtual teams by adapting team processes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16(6), 567–594.
  88. Robey, D., Khoo, H. M. & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(1), 51-66.
  89. Ryssen, S. V., & Godar, S. H. (2000). Going international without going international. Journal of International Management, 6(1), 49-60. Retrieved from 10.1016/S1075-4253(00)00019-3.
  90. Sarker, S., Lau, F. & Sahay, S. (2001). Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(1), 38-56.
  91. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., & Lingenfelter, D. (1996). Gender, group composition, and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(4), 549-565.
  92. Schumacher, T., & Poehler, L. (2009). The virtual team challenge: Is it time for training? International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), 06, 169-181. Retrieved from 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349552.
  93. Seashore S. E. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Retrieved from industrial_916_.PDF
  94. Shachaf, P. & Hara, N. (2005). Team effectiveness in virtual environments: an ecological approach. In Ferris, P. A. G. S., (Ed.), Teaching and Learning with Virtual Teams. Idea Group Publishing.
  95. Shin, Y. (2004). A person-environment fit model for virtual organizations. Journal of Management, 30(5), 725-743.
  96. Snow, C. C., Snell, S. A., & Davison, S. C. (1996). Use transnational teams to globalize your company. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 50-67.
  97. Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512.
  98. Sridhar, V., Paul, R., Nath, D., & Kapur, K. (2008). Analyzing factors that affect performance of global virtual teams. Research Gate. Retrieved from
  99. Steinfield, C. (2002). Realizing the benefits of virtual teams. Computer, 35(03), 104-106.
  100. Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G. (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3), 174-186.
  101. Summers, I., Coffelt, T., & Horton, R. E. (1988). Work group cohesion. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 627–636.
  102. Szewc, J. (2013). Selected success factors of virtual teams: literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management and Economics, 38(1), 67–83.
  103. Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., Huang, W. W. & Ng, G. N (2000). Dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 153-165.
  104. Times of India (2022). Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on why the future is about work. Retrieved from
  105. Townsend A. M., deMarie S. M. & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 17-29. Retrieved from
  106. Usoro, A., Mark, W. S., Tsui, Y. H. E. & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(3), 199–212.
  107. Vaidya, S. D. & Seetharaman, P. (2008). Degree of virtuality: a theoretical framework of factors influencing technology use by virtual teams. 19th Australasian conference on information systems, Proceedings, 83.
  108. Walther, J. (1995). Relational aspects of computer mediated communication: experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186-203.
  109. Walther, J. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.
  110. Warkentin, M. & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 271-289.
  111. Warkentin, M., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams vs. face to face teams: an exploratory study of web-based conference systems. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975–976.
  112. Watson-Manheim, M. B. & Belanger, F. (2002). Support for communication-based work processes in virtual work. E-Service Journal, 1(3), 61-82.
  113. Zaccaro, S. J. & Charles A. L. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.
  114. Zenun, M. M. N., Loureiro, G.  & Araujo, C. S. (2007). The effects of teams’ co-location on project performance in complex systems concurrent engineering-collaboration. Technology Innovation and Sustainability, (717-726). London: Springer.
  115. Zmud R., Lind, M. & Young, F. (1991). An attribute space for organizational communication channel. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 440–457.
Abstract Views: 13
PDF Views: 68

Advanced Search


PDEU: 8th Biennial I...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The objective of ICEIM 2022 is to present a sc...

International Resear...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE Mimansa Research Conference endeavours to presen...

2nd International E-...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE In the era of digitalization, the world has sh...

3rd International Co...

About the Conference At the outset, the multifarious Covid-19 pande...

International Confer...

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Today, the world of business is ...

Call for Reviewers

In keeping with JPI’s policy of commitment to high standards of ...

Call for papers

JPI invites original and unpublished manuscripts in the areas of comme...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.