Journal Press India®

International Double Taxation Relief Provisions in India : A Critical Analysis

Vol 7 , Issue 2 , July - December 2020 | Pages: 45-58 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.vision.v7i2.722038


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Rabinarayan Samantara, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Shivaji College University, Delhi, India (dr.rabisamantara@gmail.com)

International double taxation of income has been a subject of frequent debate in courts in India and abroad. Double taxation of income arises essentially when two or more countries impose taxes on the same income of a taxpayer who happens to be a resident in one country but has a certain source of income arising or accruing to him in another country (known as the source country). In view of the importance of providing double taxation relief to taxpayers, the present paper attempts to describe the historical perspective with regard to the development of Model Conventions that could be used by two different countries as the basis for formulating and entering into that double taxation avoidance agreements (DTAAs), also known as tax treaties. In this context, the Model Conventions developed by the League of Nations, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the United  Nations (UN) have been discussed. The present paper also specifically discusses the Indian law on double taxation relief as provided under Sections 90, 90A and 91 of the Income-Tax Act 1961. Finally, it has been suggested that DTAAs should not be misused for such purposes as 'double non-taxation' and 'treaty shopping'.

Keywords

Double taxation; Model conventions; DTAA; Residence principle, Source principle.

  1. Ahuja, N. (2015). Influence of double taxation avoidance agreements  on FDI : A critical review. VISION : Journal of Indian Taxation, 2(1), 75-94.
  2. Barthel, F., Busse, M. & Nenmayer, E. (2009). The impact of double taxation treaties on foreign direct investment: Evidence from large dyadic panel data. Contemporary Economic Policy, 1-12.
  3. Brauner, Y. (2003). An international tax regime in crystallization. Tax Law Review, 56, 259-328.
  4. Doernberg, R. L. (2004). International Taxation in a Nutshell. St. Paul, MN : Thomson West.
  5. Egger, P., Larch, M., Pfaffermayr, M. & Winner, H. (2006). The impact of endogenous tax treaties on foreign direct investment : Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 39(3), 901-931.
  6. Graetz, M. J. (2001). Taxing international income : Inadequate principles, outdated concepts and unsatisfactory policies. Tax Law Review, 54(3), 261-336.
  7. Jain, S. (2014).  Indian law on double tax relief. VISION : Journal of Indian Taxation, 1(1), 55-73.
  8. Kosters, B. (2004). The United Nations model tax convention and its recent developments. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 5(1&2), 4-11.
  9. Murthy, K. V. B., & Bhasin, N. (2015). The impact of bilateral tax treaties : A multi-country analysis of FDI inflows into India. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 26(4), 751-766.
  10. OECD. (1977). Model Double Taxation Convention of Income and Capital.
  11. Picciotto, S. (1992). International Business Taxation. A Study in the Internationalisation of Business Regulation. New York : Quorum.
Abstract Views: 19
PDF Views: 11

Advanced Search

News/Events

3rd International Co...

About the Conference At the outset, the multifarious Covid-19 pande...

International Confer...

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Today, the world of business is ...

Call for Reviewers

In keeping with JPI’s policy of commitment to high standards of ...

Call for papers

JPI invites original and unpublished manuscripts in the areas of comme...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.