Journal Press India®

Time-travel in the Era of Taxation: The Story of How the Indian Tax Courts Retroactively Opted to Treat Two Independent Parties as Associated Entities

Vol 10 , Issue 2 , July - December 2023 | Pages: 133-139 | Perspective  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.vision.v10i2.1022308


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Geetanjali Phadke , Legal Counsel , International Tax and Transfer Pricing, CARA Société d'Avocats , Lyon, France , France (geetanjali.phadke@cara-avocats.com)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of the Bangalore Bench in India laid down a crucial verdict in relation to a question of law that arose in 2018 concerning the tax assessment year 2014-2015. It finally reached its final destination, after a series of appeals, in February 2023 in the case of Palmer Investment Group Ltd vs. DCIT. In a nutshell, the Tribunal decreed that a transaction with an unrelated entity would be subjected to TP regulations if the said entity later becomes a related party in the same tax year. This begs the question: can a tax administration or a court retrospectively treat independent parties to an independent transaction as Associated Entities (“AE”) to a transaction which would then be deemed as a related party (“RP”) transaction? This jurisprudence is unique in itself as it is a one-of-a-kind situation, probably unseen in any other fiscally advanced country, and provides an interesting interpretation of the law taking into account the intention of the parties.

Keywords

OECD; Transfer Pricing; Transfer Pricing Methodology; International Taxation; Tax Administrations

........

Abstract Views: 4
PDF Views: 1

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.