Journal Press India®

Environmental Regulation Limits Growth Opportunity: A Case Study of the Irish Mussel Industry

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v11i2.112201020

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Patrick Enright, Department of Food Business and Development, University College Cork, Ireland
2. Eoghan McKernan, Department of Food Business and Development, University College Cork, Ireland

With continuing globalisation, there is increased competitive pressure on rural economies especially those rural regions producing commodities for the world market. Identifying and exploiting smaller specialist markets with products that can be produced locally is one strategy for diversifying local economies. In this paper, the recent development of the Irish mussel industry is examined. The development of the industry is set in its national context and a detailed analysis of the supply chain is undertaken. While the Irish industry is small relative to major international players such as China, Thailand and Spain, its development has assisted local economies with limited development opportunities. The mussel industry in Ireland is the largest aquaculture sector in terms of tonnage and second only to salmon in terms  of value. The total production volume of mussels in 2004 was 37,315 tonnes. The industry is split into two main production techniques: bottom mussels (naturally growing on the seabed and harvested using special dredging techniques) and rope mussels (cultivated on rope structures in an aquaculture environment). The principle challenge for the Irish mussel industry is environmental regulation. Despite strong demand for the product, growth of the industry is hampered by a difficulty in getting approval for licences and this delays many potential producers from getting involved in production and forces unlicensed producers to cease production. This results in a lower regional output than would otherwise be the case and also results in supply not being able to meet demand. Linked to this are regulations that protect an attractive landscape, these regulations impact on production as many licence applications are refused this has an adverse impact on the amount of mussels produced.

Keywords

Mussel Industry, Supply Chain.

  1. BIM (2006), Irish Aquaculture Report 2006, Bord Iascaigh Mhara, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.
  2. DAFF (2008), Annual Review and Outlook for Agriculture and Food 2006/2007, Department of Agriculture and Food, Dublin.
  3. LaFleur, E., Yeates, D. and Aysen, A. (2005), Estimating the Economic Impact of the Wild Shrimp, Penaeus sp., Fishery: A Study of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, Marine Fisheries Review 2005, Vol.67, No.1, p.28-42.
  4. Lindahl, O., Hart, R., Hernroth, B., Kollberg, S., Loo, L., Olrog, L., Rehnstam-Holm, A., Svensson, J., Svensson, S. and Syversen, U. (2005), Improving Marine Water Quality by Mussel Farming: A Profitable Solution for Swedish Society, AMBIO – A Journal of the Human Environment, Vol.34, No.2, p.131-138.
  5. Lindkvist, K.B. and Antelo, A.P. (2007), Restructuring a Peripheral Coastal Community: The Case of a Galician Fishing Town, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.31, No.2, p.363-383.
  6. Mongruel, R. and Thebaud, O. (2006), Externalities, Institutions and the Location Choices of Shellfish Producers: The Case of Blue Mussel Farming in the Mont-Saint-Michel Bay (France), Aquaculture Economics and Management, Vol.10, No.3, p.163-181.
  7. Ottensen G. and Gronhaug, K. (2004), Percieved Opportunities and Pursued Strategies in an Emerging Industry: The Case of Norwegian Blue Mussel Farming, Aquaculture Economics and Management, 2004, Vol.8, Issue 2, p.19-40.
  8. PWC (PriceWaterhouseCoopers) (2006), A Review of the Irish Rope Mussel Industry, Bord Iascaigh Mhara, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland.
  9. Phyne, J. and Mansilla, J. (2003), Forging Links in the Commodity Chain: The Case of the Chilean Salmon Farming Industry, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol.43, No.2, p.108-127.
  10. Rosenthal, H. and Hilge, V. (2000), Aquaculture Production and Environmental Regulations in Germany, Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Vol.16, No.4/5, p.163-166.
  11. Roycroft, D., Kelly, T.C, and Lewis, L.J. (2004), Birds, Seals and the Suspension Culture of Mussels in Bantry Bay, A non- seaduck Area in Southwest Ireland, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol.61, No.4, pp.703-712.
  12. Sterner, H. (2005), Obtaining Access to Coastal Areas for Large-scale Mussel Farming: Obstacles and Possibilities, AMBIO
  13. A Journal of Human Environment, Vol.34, 2, p.151-156.
Abstract Views: 4
PDF Views: 0

Advanced Search

News/Events

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

Birla Institute of M...

Birla Institute of Management Technology (BIMTECH) 3rd Pritam Singh M...

OP Jindal University...

OP Jindal University, India 4th International Conference on  ...

Department of MBA, N...

Department of MBA, Narayana Engineering College Nellore International...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management Conference Proceedings,...

Online Proceedings R...

Conference Proceedings, March 2023 ISBN: 978-81-956810-6-8 ...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.