Journal Press India®

Impact of Globalisation on India’s exports with special reference to Regional Trade Agreements

Vol 1, Issue 2, July - December 2014 | Pages: 42-54 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/focus.v1i2.2484


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. Niti Bhasin, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India (nitisurydse@gmail.com)
2. * Rinku Manocha, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Hindu College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India (rmanocha2002@yahoo.com)

Coinciding with the era of globalisation, there has been a rise in the number and depth of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in the Asian region. As India has also been a part of this growing trend, this paper attempt to identify the determinants of India’s exports with special focus on the role of globalisation and RTAs of India. We employ panel data regression on an augmented gravity model to examine the effects of these variables. To capture the globalisation effect, we have included trade openness of the host country. For RTAs, we have taken two variables; one which indicates the presence or absence of an RTA in a given year; and second is the number of RTAs between India and its partner country. Using data for nine countries which are India’s trading partners over the period 1991-2012, we find that GDP and GDP per capita of the host country are significant determinants of India’s exports. Trade openness which is an indicator of globalisation is positive and highly significant indicating that trade openness of the partner country has resulted in increased Indian exports to that country. Of the two variables capturing the impact of RTAs, the variable defining the number of RTAs negotiated with trading partners is positive and significant. The results show that while presence of an RTA may have a positive impact on Indian exports, they are still not a prime consideration. At the same time, the width of integration is having a significant positive impact on India’s export.

Keywords

Globalisation, Regional Trade Agreements, India, Exports, Trade Openness

  1. Afesorgbor, Sylvanus and van Bergeijk, Peter A. G (2011). Multi-Membership and the Effectiveness of Regional Trade Agreements in Western and Southern Africa: A Comparative Study of ECOWAS and SADC (Institute of Social Sciences Working Paper No. 520). Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1766522 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1766522
  2. Akhter, Naseem and Ghani, Ejaz (2010). Regional integration South Asia: An analysis of Trade flows using the gravity model. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(2):105-118.
  3. Anderson Kym (2010). Globalisation effects on world agricultural Trade, 1960 to 2050.(Centre for International Economic Studies Working Papers with number 2010-11). Retrieved from:
  4. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cies/publications/present/CIES_DP1011.pdf.
  5. Guilhot (2010). Assessing the impact of main East-Asian free trade agreements using a gravity model. First results. Economic Bulletin, 30(1):282-291.
  6. K. Muhammad & A. Yucer (2010). Trade effects of regional trade agreements: Trade creation and trade diversion within the Western Hemisphere, International Journal of Economic Issues. 3(2): 221-238.
  7. Lee, Jong-Wha and Shin, Kwanho (2006). Does regionalism lead to more global trade Integration in East Asia? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 17(3):283-301.
  8. Rahman, M., Shadat, W.B., and Das, N.C. (2006). Trade Potential in SAFTA : An Application of Augmented Gravity Model (Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) Working paper no. 61).Retrieved from website: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pdb/opaper/61.html
  9. Shahdad, Naghshpour &  Bruno, Sergi S (2009). World trade  indicators and a new approach to measure globalisation and countries openness. Journal of Trade and Global market. 2(1):1-24. DOI:10.1504/IJTGM.2009.02303.
  10. Subasat Turan(2008). Do liberal trade policies promote trade openness? International Review of Applied Economics. 22(1):45-61. DOI:10.1080/02692170701745887.
Abstract Views: 808
PDF Views: 280

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.