Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

The relationship between economic growth and environmental quality has been under much dispute. Over the years, several studies have identified inverted-U shaped relationships between per capita income and some measure of environmental degradation. This has led to the emergence of a burgeoning literature on what has come to be known about as the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). According to the EKC hypothesis, environmental damage increases in the early stages of economic growth, but diminishes once nations reach higher levels of income. This literature is important as it acknowledges the possibility of trade and growth being good for the environment. Against this backdrop, we have attempted to give an overview of some of the studies published on EKC and subsequently critically appraised the same. The EKC has been criticised for its simplified assumptions and the literature appears to be largely econometrically weak. It has been shown to apply to select environmental indicators for certain countries; hence its validity as a universal phenomenon remains questionable.

Owing to global implications of environmental degradation, more efforts are required to examine the validity of EKC as a global phenomenon by relating a composite index of environmental degradation to a better measure of economic development across nations.

Keywords

Environmental Kuznets Curve, Economic growth, Environmental degradation

1. Babu, Swati Sinha & Datta, Soumyendra Kishore (2013). The relevance of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in a framework of broad-based environmental degradation and modified measure of growth – A pooled data analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(4): 309-316.
2. Beckerman, Wilfred (1992). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Development, 20: 481- 496.
3. Cole, Matthew A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48: 71–81.
4. De Bruyn, S.M. & Opschoor, J.B. (1997). Developments in the throughput-income relationship: Theoretical and empirical observations. Ecological Economics, 20: 255-268.
5. De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves’. Ecological Economics, 25: 161-175.
6. Dinda, Soumyananda (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49: 431- 455.
7. Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R. & Liu, Y. (2012). CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42: 450-460.
8. Jha, Raghbendra & Murthy, K.V. B. (2003). An Inverse Global Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(2): 352-368.
9. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory - Part A: Concept, causes and the COemissions case. Energy Policy, 62: 1392-1402.
10. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues. Energy Policy, 62: 1403-1411.
11. Kanjilal, Kakali & Ghosh, Sajal (2013). Environmental Kuznet’s Curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy, 56: 509-515.
12. Kuznets, Simon. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.
13. Bhanu Murthy, K.V. & Bhasin, Niti (forthcoming). Environmental Kuznets Curve: Co₂ Emissions, Pollution Havens and Type of Economic Development. In Emerging Dynamics of Sustainability in Multinational Enterprises, Ed. Rabi Narayan Kar et al,  Edward Elgar, London.
14. Panayotou, Theodore. (2003). Economic growth and the environment. Economic Survey of Europe: UNECE, 2:45-72.
15. Pezzey, John C.V. (1989). Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development. Environment Department Working Paper No. 15. Washington D.C.: World Bank. Published as ‘Sustainable Developemnt Concepts: An Economic Analysis’. World Bank Environment Paper No. 2. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
16. Rothman, Dale S. (1998). Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecological Economics, 25: 177–194.
17. Stern, David I., Common, Michael S. & Barbier, Edward B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development’. World Development, 24 (7): 1151–1160.
18. Stern David I. (2004). The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8): 1419-1439.
19. Vehmas, Jarmo, Kaivo-oja, Jari & Luukkanen, Jyrki. (2003). Global trends of linking environmental stress and economic growth’. Tutu publications, Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, 7, 1-24.
20. Zhao, Fengxia, Xu, Ming, Zheng, Yunpu, Wong, Michelle Hang Gi, & Chi, Yonggang (2013). Improving the Environmental Kuznets Curve for evaluating the relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and economic development. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 11(2): 1193-1199.