Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

The law of comparative advantage forms the basis of international trade, which has been the backbone of the commercial world for long. In a bid to open up the economy and integrate it with the world economy, India has been undertaking a series of economic reforms since 1991, including trade reforms. In this light, this paper attempts to identify the sectors/commodities where India holds comparative advantage. The study also attempts to map the technological structure of India’s exports, and also analyse the structural changes in the pattern of trade specialisation. The study has been conducted using data relating to exports of all 97 commodities of the Harmonized System (HS-1992) classification for three periods namely average over 1996-98, 2003-05 and 2011-13. The study found that India holds comparative advantage in a variety of products. However, an overall deterioration in India’s RCA indices over the three periods was also found. The examination of the structural changes in the Revealed Comparative Advantage to find out whether the initial pattern of trade specialisation has strengthened or weakened revealed that India is in the stage of de-specialisation. So, there is a need for India to take steps in order to strengthen its comparative advantage. ​

Keywords

Exports, Revealed Comparative Advantage, Trade Specialisation, Commodities, Balassa Index, Galtonian regression, India

1. Abidin, M.Z. & Loke, W.H. (2008). Revealed comparative advantage of Malaysian exports: The case for changing export composition. Asian Economic Papers, 7:130-147.
2. Balassa, Bela. (1977). Revealed comparative advantage revisited: An analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953-1971. The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, 45(4): 327-344.
3. Balassa, Bela. (1986). Comparative advantage in manufactured goods: A reappraisal. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2): 315-319.
4. Bano, Sayeeda & Frank, Scrimgeour. (2012). The export growth and revealed comparative advantage of the New Zealand kiwifruit industry. International Business Research, 5(2): 73-82.
5. Batra, A. & Z. Khan. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China. ICRIER Working Paper No. 168, New Delhi.
6. Central Intelligence Agency. (2016). India. The World Factbook. Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html
7. Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: De-specialisation and ‘Stickiness’. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3): 423-443.
8. Hinloopen, J. & Marrewijk, C. Van (2008). The relevance of the Hillman condition for revealed comparative advantage: 10 stylised facts. Applied Economics, 40(18): 2313-2328.
9. Khatibi, A. (2008). Kazakhstan’s revealed comparative advantage vis-à-vis the EU-2. ECIPE Working Paper no. 03/2008.
10. Laursen, Keld. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialisation. Eurasian Business Review, 5: 99-115.
11. Le, Q. P. (2010). Evaluating Vietnam’s changing revealed comparative advantage patterns. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(2): 221-230.
12. Mzumara, Macleans, Chingarande, Anna, & Karambakuwa, Roseline, (2013). An analysis of the revealed comparative advantage in Southern African development community member states. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 15(4): 1-15.
13. Serin, V. & Civan, A. (2008). Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness: A case study for Turkey towards the EU. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 10(2): 25-41.
14. Sanidas, Elias & Yousun, Shin. (2011). Convergence towards the revealed comparative advantage neutral point for East Asia: similarities and differences between the three countries. Seoul Journal of Economics, 24(1): 21-50.
15. Sharma, A. & M., Dietrich, (2007). The structure and composition of India's exports and industrial transformation (1980-2000). International Economic Journal, 21: 207-231.
16. United Nations (2014). UN COMTRADE Database. Available at http://comtrade.un.org/db/
17. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2015). UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics. New York: United Nations. Available at http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/
18. Visser, M., Pisa, N. M., Kleynhans, E.P.J., & Wait, R. (2015). Identifying the comparative advantage of products and industries of South Africa’s Mpumalanga province. South African Business Review, 19(2): 27-50.
19. Vollrath, T. (1991).  A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative. Review of World Economics, 127: 265-280.
20. World Bank (2013). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.