Journal Press India®

Do Institutional Variables affect FDI inflows? A Panel Data Analysis of South Asian Countries

Vol 4, Issue 2, July - December 2017 | Pages: 26-43 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/focus.v4i02.11687


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Vandana Goswami, Assistant Professor, Satyawati College (M), University of Delhi, Delhi, India (vandana.goswami.2006@gmail.com)

The study addresses several questions related to the effect of institutional variables on foreign direct investment inflows in South Asian countries consisting of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The institutional variables taken in the study include control of corruption, political instability, quality of governance, regulatory quality, and rule of law. The paper uses panel data for the period of 1990-2015. The objective of this paper is to study the impact of institutional determinants on FDI inflows in eight South Asian countries. The main findings of the paper indicate that government effectiveness and trade openness are having a positive impact on FDI inflows while control of corruption and regulatory quality have negatively affected FDI inflows in these eight South Asian Countries.

Keywords

Corruption; Political instability; Rule of law; Regulatory quality; FDI

  1. Anghel, B. (2005). Do institutions affect foreign direct investment? International doctorate in economic analysis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 2-40.   
  2. Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. The World Economy, 29(1), 63-77.
  3. Barassi, M. R., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The effect of corruption on FDI: a parametric and non-parametric analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(3), 302-312.
  4. Barnes, I., & Davison, L. (1994). European business. Butterworth Heinenmann, Oxford.
  5. Belderbos, R., & Carree, M. (2002). The location of Japanese investments in China: Agglomeration effects, keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 16(2), 194-211.
  6. Blanc-Brude, F., Cookson, G., Piesse, J., & Strange, R. (2014). The FDI location decision: Distance and the effects of spatial dependence. International Business Review, 23(4), 797-810.
  7. Busse, M. (2004). Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos, 57(1), 45-65.
  8. Campos, N.F., Estrin, S., & Proto, E. (2010). Corruption as a barrier to entry: theory and evidence. IZA Research Paper, vol. 5243. Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), Bonn.
  9. Chen, C. (2011). Foreign direct investment in China, location determinants, investor difference and economic impacts. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. Cheng, L. K., & Kwan, Y. K. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience. Journal of International Economics51(2), 379-400.
  11. Curwen, P., & Hartley, K. (1997). Privatisation: Understanding the UK economy. 4th edition, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  12. Deichmann, U., Lall, S. V., Redding, S. J., & Venables, A. J. (2008). Industrial location in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 219-246.
  13. Du, J., Lu, Y., & Tao, Z. (2012). Institutions and FDI location choice: The role of cultural distances. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 210-223.
  14. Dunning, J. H. (2001). The key literature on IB activities: 1960-2000. In A.M. Rugman and T.L. Brewer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, pp. 36-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Dunning, J. H. (2002). Regions, globalization, and the knowledge-based economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Gatignon, H., & Kimberly, J. R. (2004). Globalization and its challenges. In H. Gatignon, J.R. Kimberly and R.E. Gunther. (eds.) The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalizing: Strategies for Building Successful Global Business, pp. 1-22. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  17. Godinez, J. R., & Liu, L. (2015). Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1), 33-42.
  18. Grosse, R., & Trevino, L. J. (2005). New institutional economics and FDI location in Central and Eastern Europe. MIR: Management International Review, 45(2), 123-145.
  19. International Monetary Fund (IMF), (2004). Definition of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) terms, IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics and OECD workshop on International Investment Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/External/ NP/Sta/bop/pdf/diteg20.pdf
  20. Jadhav, P. (2012). Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS economies: Analysis of economic, institutional and political factor. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 5-14.
  21. Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71-121.
  22. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222-279.
  23. Li, S., & Park, S. H. (2006). Determinants of locations of foreign direct investment in China. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 95-119.
  24. Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific business review, 17(3), 281-299.
  25. Narayan, L. (2014). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Indian. International Journal of Research, 1(7), 815–823.
  26. Okafor, G. (2015). Locational determinants of US outward FDI into sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(1), 187-205.
  27. Pournarakis, M., & Varsakelis, N. (2004). Institutions, internationalization and FDI: the case of economies in transition. Transnational Corporations, 13(2), 77-94.
  28. Smarzynska, B. K., & Wei, S. J. (2000). Corruption and composition of foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence (Vol. 7969). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  29. Sury, N. (2008). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Indian. Foreign Trade Review, 42(4), 24-41.
  30. Wei, S.-J. (2000a). How taxing is corruption on international investors. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1–11.
  31. Wei, S.-J. (2000b). Local corruption and global capital flows. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 31(2), 303–354.
  32. World Bank (1997). Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network. September.
  33. Yu, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2010). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A sectoral and institutional approach. IMF Working Paper WP/10/187, Asian Pacific Department.
Abstract Views: 159
PDF Views: 292

News/Events

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.