Journal Press India®
What worth is a BIT? Impact of BITs on FDI Inflows into India
Vol 4, Issue 2, July - December 2017 | Pages: 59-72 | Research Paper
Published Online: November 30, 2017
Author Details
( * ) denotes Corresponding author
Developing countries often consider foreign direct investment (FDI) as an engine to boost economic growth. Therefore they try to promote investment inflow by various means. One approach is to offer investment guarantees to foreign investors using Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). Following international best practice, India has signed a number of BITs to stimulate inflow of FDI. Till date, the Government of India has signed BITs with 83 countries. These BITs were largely negotiated on the basis of the Indian Model BIT of 1993. There have been recent moves that point in the direction of India fundamentally altering the text of its BITs with countries, including calling off existing BITs and approving a new model BIT. However, concerns have been raised as to the possible pernicious impact of these changes on the inflow of FDI into India. This paper investigates whether the concern is warranted at all – by asking if BITs significantly impact the inflow of FDI. It is established that BIT is indeed a veritable boost to FDI inflow, and the estimated coefficient remains significant and robust across econometric specifications. Therefore, a note of caution is sounded for the rejigging exercise involving BITs that has been initiated by India.
Keywords
Bilateral Investment Treaties; Foreign Direct Investment; India
- Banga, R. (2003). Impact of government policies and investment agreements on FDI inflows. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper, 116.
- Bhasin, N & Manocha, R. (2016). Do bilateral investment treaties promote FDI inflows? Evidence from India. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 41(4), 275-287.
- Disdier, A. & Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37-48.
- Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. Hesselborn & P. M. Wijkman (Eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity. London: Macmillan.
- Grosse, R. & Trevino, L. J. (2005). New institutional economics and FDI location in central and eastern Europe. Management International Review, 45(2), 123– 45.
- Hallward-Driemeier, M. (2003). Do bilateral investment treaties attract FDI? Only a bit…and they could bite. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3121.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Brookings Institution. Draft Policy Research Working Paper. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/ wgi/pdf/wgi.pdf
- Neumayer, E. & Spess, L. (2005). Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1567–585.
- Salacuse, J. W. & Sullivan, N. P. (2005). Do BITs really work: An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain. Harvard International Law Journal, 46(1), 67-130.
- UNCTAD. (1998). Bilateral Investment Treaties in the mid 1990s. New York: United Nations.
- UNCTAD. (2003). World Investment Report 2003: FDI policies for development. New York-Geneva: United Nations.
- Vandervelde, K., Aranda, J. V. & Zimny, Z. (1998). Bilateral investment treaties in the mid-1990s. New York-Geneva: UNCTAD.
Abstract Views: 157
PDF Views: 286