Journal Press India®

Development of Institutional Theory and its Application to MNE Context: A Review of Literature

Vol 4, Issue 2, July - December 2017 | Pages: 124-141 | Review paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/focus.v4i02.11693


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Adithi Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Department of Commerce, Delhi, India (reach.adithi@gmail.com)

Institutional theory is an important framework for various research fields. It gives a general frame of reference as to what constitutes an institution and what are the factors that affect it. However, the theory requires more than a general frame of reference because in today’s world the characteristics of the organizations are changing with the change in factors related as well as unrelated to the processes of organization. In this background, the paper attempts to provide a brief historical overview of institutions, institutionalisation, differences among institutions and institutional environment to unveil the development of institutional theory. It also looks at the application of institutional theory in the context of multinational enterprises. The findings indicate that emphasis of institutional theory has shifted from generalized system of social belief to appropriate means to become legitimate with the pressures.

Keywords

Institutional theory; Institutional environment; Institutional mechanism; Multinational enterprises

  1. Andrews, A., Powell, W. & DiMaggio, P. (1993). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 691.
  2. Ang, S., Benischke, M. & Doh, J. (2014). The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1536-1553.
  3. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality (65-85). Great Britain: The Penguin Press.
  4. Björkman, I., Fey, C. & Park, H. (2007). Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 430-446.
  5. Dacin, M. T. (1997). Isomorphism in context: The power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46-81.
  6. Deephouse, D. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039.
  7. Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. (2009). Institutional environment and subsidiary survival. Management International Review, 49(3), 291-312.
  8. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147.
  9. Kar R. N., Bhasin, N. & Stojanovska S. (2015). How does institutional mechanism influence competitiveness? Research agenda and evidence from selected countries. Paper presented at Fifth Reading-UNCTAD International Business Conference held at Henley Business School, University of Reading, UK, 13-14 June.
  10. Kondra, A. & Hinings, C. (1998). Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19(5), 743-767.
  11. Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233.
  12. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308-324.
  13. Kostova, T., & S. Zaheer. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81.
  14. Kostova, T., Roth, K. & Dacin, M. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.
  15. Meyer, J. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
  16. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (pp. 3-6). Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University.
  17. Phillips, N. & Tracey, P. (2009). Institutional theory and the MNC. The Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 169-171.
  18. Phillips, N., Tracey, P. & Karra, N.(2009). Rethinking institutional distance: Strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strategic Organization, 7(3), 339-348.
  19. Powell, W.W., & DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Scott, W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493.
  21. Scott, W. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In: K. Smith, ed., Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
  22. Scott, W.R. ed. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  23. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25-35.
  24. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson.
  25. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism "Old" and "New". Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270-277.
  26. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. P. March (ed.), Handbookof Organizations, pp. 142-193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.
  27. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
  28. Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14-20.
  29. Tolbert, P. & Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22-39.
  30. Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.). Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 175-190. London: SAGE
  31. Zucker, L. (1977). The role of institutionalisation in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726.
  32. Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443-464.
Abstract Views: 201
PDF Views: 279

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.