Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

In view of the growing importance of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in the era of trade liberalization, we examine the impact of two significant RTAs of India, SAARC trading bloc and APTA, on its trade potential. We employ panel data regression on an augmented gravity model using data over the period 1991-2016 for 23 Asian countries which are India’s trading partners. In order to capture the impact of explanatory variables, the study uses fixed effects estimation and Hausman Taylor estimation. Our results show that conventional gravity variables such as GDP of the trading partners and liberal trade policies are significant determinants of India’s trade. The results for variables of interest, APTA and SAPTA (for SAARC) export/import creation indicate that both the trading bloc are facilitating India’s trade flow. The ‘age’ variable for SAARC trading bloc show that India’s imports from SAARC nations has significantly reduced with the passage of time and India’s exports to APTA trading bloc is more or less stagnant since the last decade. While China and Korea are dominating intra-APTA exports but India’s intra-SAARC exports are gaining more strength with passage of time.

Keywords

Regional Trade Agreement (RTA); SAPTA; APTA; Trade creation

1. Acharya, S. (2012). A panel data analysis of foreign trade determinants of Nepal: Gravity model approach. NRB working paper series, NRB-WP-13,2012.
2. Afesorgbor, S. & Van Bergeijk, P. A. J. V. (2011). Multi-membership and the effectiveness of regional trade agreements in Western and Southern Africa: A comparative study of ECOWAS and SADC. Institute of Social Sciences Working Paper No. 520.
3. Akhter, N. & Ghani, E. (2010). Regional integration South Asia: An analysis of Trade flows using the gravity model. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(2), 105-118.
4. Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley.
5. Bhasin, N. & Manocha, R. (2014). The impact of globalization on India’s export with special reference to regional trade agreements. FOCUS: Journal of International Business, 1(2), 43-54.
6. Bossogo, P. E. & Mendis, C. (2002). Trade and integration in the Caribbean. IMF Working Paper no. 02/148.
7. Carrere, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of the regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223-247.
8. Cernat, L. (2001). Assessing regional trade arrangements: Are South-South RTAs more trade diverting? Global Economy Quarterly, 2(3), 235-259.
9. Coulibaly, S. (2007). Evaluating the trade effect of developing regional trade agreements: A semi-parametric approach. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 4220.
10. Dee, P. & Gal, J. (2003). The trade and investment effects of preferential trade agreements. NBER Working paper No. 10160.
11. Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (1998). The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In Jeffrey A. Frankel (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy (pp. 33-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Eita, J. H. (2008, July). Determinants of Namibian exports: A gravity model approach. Paper presented at the 13^th African econometric conference, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
13. Gu, J. (2008). A gravity analysis of China’s export growth (Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Economics-Simon Fraser University).
14. Guilhot, L. (2010). Assessing the impact of main East-Asian free trade agreements using a gravity model. First results. Economic Bulletin, 30(1), 282-291.
15. Gul, N. & Yasin, H. M (2011). The trade potential of Pakistan: An application of the gravity model. The Lahore Journal of Economic, 16(1), 23-62.
16. Hausman, A. J. and Taylor, E. W. (1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1377-1398.
17. Hirantha, S. W. (2004). From SAPTA to SAFTA: Gravity analysis of South Asian free trade. Mimco, Department of Economics, Nagoya University, Japan.
18. Kurihara, Y. (2011). The impact of regional trade agreements on international trade. Modern economies, 2(5), 846-849.
19. Johnson, H. G. (1960). The economic theory of customs unions. Pakistan Economic Review, 10, 14–30.
20. Lee, J. W. & Shin, K. (2005). Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 283-301.
21. Muhammad, K. & Yucer, A. (2010). Trade effects of regional trade agreements: Trade creation and trade diversion within the Western hemisphere. International Journal of Economic Issues, 3(2), 221-238.
22. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69-85.
23. OECD (2001). Retrieved from website: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=3127
24. Park, I. (2009). Regional trade agreements in East Asia: Will they be sustainable? Asian Economic Journal, 23(2), 169-194.
25. Rahman, M., Shadat, W.B., & Narayan, D. C. (2006). Trade potential in SAFTA: An application of augmented gravity model. Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) Working paper no. 61.
26. Sadikov, A.(2008). External tariff liberalisation in CARICOM: a commodity level analysis. (IMF Working Paper no.WP/08/33). Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp0833.pdf.
27. Soloaga, I. & Wintersb, A. L., (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: what effect on trade? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1-29.
28. Special Report on Integration and Trade, Inter-American Development (2009). Bridging regional trade agreements in the Americas. Retrieved from http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=2252290
29. Urata, S. & Okabe, M. (2007). The impact of free trade agreements on trade flows: An application of the gravity model approach. RIETI discussion paper. Retrieved from: http:/rieti.go.jp/en.
30. Viner, J. (1950).  The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950.
31. Vollrath, T. L. & Hallahan, C. B. (2009, July). Economic costs and payoffs of bilateral/regional trade agreements. Paper provided by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association in its series 2009 Annual Meeting, Milwaukee, Wisconsin with number 49375.
32. Wadhwa, D. (2009). Assessing the potential for growth of intraregional trade in South. Working paper by United Nations economic and social commission for Asia and the pacific (ESCAP) in its series. Studies in Trade and Investment.