Journal Press India®

Significance of Intellectual Property Rights in the Era of Global Value Chain: A Case Study of Apple

Vol 9 , Issue 1 , January - June 2022 | Pages: 63-78 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.focus.v9i1.912204


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Palvinder Kaur, Associate Professor, Commerce, PGDAV College evening, University of Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India (royalpalvi16@gmail.com)

After emerging out of the extensive outsourcing activities of multinational corporations, the virtual factory model is now playing a prominent role in globalization. Using Apple as a case study, we will explore the concept of a virtual manufacturer. As multinational corporations extensively use intellectual property in emerging markets, they are also concerned about the infringement of intellectual property rights. This study examines this problem that has become increasingly relevant in the context of the protection of intellectual property rights in global value chains and trade. An international index is used to demonstrate that rights to intellectual property are typically excellent in industrialized countries and adequate in the majority of developing countries. The trade dispute between the US and China has received considerable attention here.

Keywords

Global value chain; Intellectual property rights; MNCs; Virtual firms; Apple; Trade dispute

  1. Alsamawi, A, C. Cadestin, A. Jaax, J. Guilhoto, S.  Miroudot, and C. Zurcher ( 2020), “Returns to Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains: New Evidence on Trends and Policy Determinants” OECD Trade Policy Papers. No. 240.
  2. Apple (2018). Form 10-k. Retrieved from U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission.
  3. Bayard, K., Byrne, D., & Smith, D. (2015). The scope of US factoryless manufacturing. In S. N. Houseman and M. Mandel, (eds.), Measuring Globalization: Better Trade Statistics for Better Policy (2). Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  4. Bolatto, S., Naghavi, A., Ottaviano, G. & Kejzar, K. Z. (2011). Intellectual property and the organization of the global value chain. Retrieved from www.frit.org.
  5. Cummins, J. G. (2005). A new approach to the valuation of intangible capital. In C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, & D. Sichel, (eds.), Measuring Capital in the New Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. De Haan, M., & J. Haynes. (2018). R&D capitalisation: Where did we go wrong? Paper presented at the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth: The Challenges of Globalisation in the Measurement of National Accounts. March 9–10. Washington, DC.
  7. Durand, C., & Milberg, W. (2018). Intellectual monopoly in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy. 27(2), 404–429.
  8. Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (1996). Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality. American Economic Review, 86(2), 240–245.
  9. Frankel, S. (2014). Emerging regulatory issues intellectual property and global value chains. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v10i4.4514.
  10. Fu, X., & Ghauri, P. (2020). Trade in intangibles and the global trade imbalance. World Economy. 44(5), 1448–1469.
  11. Heuser, C., & Mattoo, A. (2017). Services trade and global value chains. In Global Development Report 2017: Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  12. International Property Right Index (2020). Retrieved from https://www.propertyrights alliance.org/news/pra-launches-the-2020-international-property-rights-index/  
  13. Jenniges, D., Mataloni, R., Stutzman, S. & Xin, Y. (2018). Strategic movement of intellectual property within US multinational enterprises. Paper presented at the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c14140/c14140.pdf.
  14. Kim, Y. K. (2012). Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Research Policy, 41(2), 358-375. Retrieved from DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.003.
  15. Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2014). Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494.
  16. Kowalski, P., Gonzalez, J. L., Ragoussis, A., & Ugarte, C. (2015). Participation of developing countries in global value chains: implications for trade and trade-related policies. OECD Trade Policy Papers. No. 179. Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  17. Loukil, K. (2020). Non-linear effects of intellectual property rights on technological innovation: Evidence from emerging and developing countries. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344676744_Non-Linear_Effects_of_Intellectual_Property_Rights_on_Technological_Innovation_Evidence_from_Emerging_and_Developing_Countries.
  18. McKinsey (2019). Globalization in transition: The future of trade and value chains. Mckinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/innovation-and-growth/globalization-in-transition-the-future-of-trade-and- value-chains.
  19. Meng, B., Ye, M. & Wei, S. J. (2020). Measuring smile curves in global value chains. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(5), 988–1016.
  20. Nike (2018). Form 10-K Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ 320187/000032018719000051/nke-531201910k.htm.
  21. Ocean, T. (2020). Intangible asset market value study. Chicago, IL: Ocean Tomo Intellectual Capital Equity. Retrieved from https://www.oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market- value-study/
  22. Thitima, P. (2007). Intellectual property rights as a signal. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24129725_Intellectual_Property_Rights_as_a_Signal.
  23. Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., Yu, X. & Zhu, K. (2021). Tracing value added in the presence of multinational firms: With an application to high tech sectors.
  24. WIPO (2017). World intellectual property report 2017: Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains. Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details .jsp?id=4225.
  25. World Bank (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chain. Washington DC.
  26. Xing, Y. (2020). Global value chain and the missing exports of United States. China Economic Review, 61(C), 101429.
Abstract Views: 13
PDF Views: 33

Advanced Search

News/Events

PDEU: 8th Biennial I...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The objective of ICEIM 2022 is to present a sc...

International Resear...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE Mimansa Research Conference endeavours to presen...

2nd International E-...

ABOUT THE CONFERENCE In the era of digitalization, the world has sh...

3rd International Co...

About the Conference At the outset, the multifarious Covid-19 pande...

International Confer...

ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Today, the world of business is ...

Call for Reviewers

In keeping with JPI’s policy of commitment to high standards of ...

Call for papers

JPI invites original and unpublished manuscripts in the areas of comme...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.