Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Prototyping or model making is one of the important steps to finalize a product design. It helps in conceptualization of a design. Before the start of full production a prototype is usually fabricated and tested. RP processes namely Stereo-lithography (SL), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM) are described. In Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) process, fine polymeric powder like polystyrene, polycarbonate or polyamide etc. (20 to 100 micrometer diameter) is spread on the substrate using a roller. Before starting CO2 laser scanning for sintering of a slice the temperature of the entire bed is raised just below its melting point by infrared heating in order to minimize thermal distortion (curling) and facilitate fusion to the previous layer. The laser is modulated in such a way that only those grains, which are in direct contact with the beam, are affected. Once laser scanning cures a slice, bed is lowered and powder feed chamber is raised so that a covering of powder can be spread evenly over the build area by counter rotating roller. In this process support structures are not required as the un-sintered powder remains at the places of support structure. It is cleaned away and can be recycled once the model is complete. This research has examined the effect of Laser power as well as processing parameters on the mechanical properties of selective laser sintered parts from DURAFORM PA In this research tensile specimens of Polyamide (DURAFORM PA) material as per the test standard ‘ASTM D638’ are fabricated. This test method covers the determination of the tensile properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics in the form of standard dumbbell-shaped test specimens when tested under defined conditions of pre-treatment, temperature, humidity, and testing machine speed. The effects of varying the Laser power, generated by the laser, on the physical and mechanical properties of produced specimens. The energy density is varied by changing the laser power at a fixed value of laser scan spacing. Knowing the relationship between SLS parameter settings and material properties will make it possible to manufacture parts with predetermined properties, customized for various applications.

Keywords

Selective Laser Sintering; Rapid Prototyping; Manufacturing; ASTM D 368; Design of Experiments; Tensile Testing

1. ofetd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12606529/index.pdf[Accessed on Jan 15, 2013]


2. Ö. İlkgün (2005): Effects of production parameters on porosity and hole properties in laser sintering rapid prototyping process. M.Sc. thesis in Mechanical Engineering. Middle East Technical University.


3. S. K. Singhal, P. K. Jain, P. M. Pandey (2008): Adaptive Slicing for SLS Prototyping. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 5(1-4),


4. Pandey, P.M., Reddy N.V., Dhande, S.G. (2003a) Slicing Procedures in Layered Manufacturing: A Review, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9(5),


5. C. M. Tekin(2009): Mechanical characterization and modeling of porous polymeric materials manufactured by selective laser sintering. M.Sc. Thesis in mechanical engineering. Middle East Technical University.


6. Pandey, P.M., Reddy, N.V., Dhande, S.G. (2003b) Real Time Adaptive Slicing for Fused Deposition Modeling, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43(1), http://www.efunda.com/processing/rapid_prototyping/. [Accessed Jan 18, 2013].


7. Pandey, P.M., Reddy, N.V., Dhande, S.G. (2004a) Part Deposition Orientation Studies in Layered Manufacturing, Proceeding of International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing Technology,


8. http://www.mne.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm. [Accessed Feb.15, 2013].


9. Pandey, P.M., Thrimurthullu, K., Reddy, N.V. (2004b) Optimal Part Deposition Orientation in FDM using Multi-Criteria GA, International Journal of Production Research, 42(19),


10. S. Kumar (2010): Selective laser sintering: Recent advances. CSIR National Laser Centre.


11. Singhal, S.K., Pandey, A.P., Pandey, P.M., Nagpal, A.K. (2005) Optimum Part Deposition Orientation in Stereolithography, Computer Aided Design and Applications, 2 (1-4).


12. Thrimurthullu, K., Pandey, P.M., Reddy, N.V. (2004) Part Deposition Orientation in Fused Deposition Modeling, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2004,


13. http://www.lasersintering.com/sls-information.php#sls. [Accessed Feb 20, 2013]


14. Williams, R.E., Komaragiri., S.N., Melton, V.L., Bishu, R.R. (1996) Investigation of the Effect of Various Build Methods on the Performance of Rapid Prototyping (Stereo lithography), Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 61, (1-2),


15. D.T. Pham, R.S. Gault: “A Comparison of Rapid Prototyping Technologies”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf, Vol 38,


16. P. K. Jain, P. M. Pandeyand, P.V.M. Rao (2008): Experimental investigations for improving part strength in selective laser sintering. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. Taylor & Francis.


17. J. D. Williams, C. R. Deckard, (1998): Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 4 Issue: 2,


18. http://www.3dsystems.com/learning-center/case-studies/selective-laser-sintering-delivers-precision-quality-and-increased[Accessed Feb 22, 2013]


19. C.E. Majewski, H. Zarringhalam, D. Toon, U. Ajoku, N. Hopkinson, M.P. Caine (2009): The use of off-line part production to predict the tensile properties of parts produced by Selective Laser Sintering. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 209, Issue 6,


20. www.astm.org/Standard/index.shtml[Accessed Feb 24, 2013]


21. Rosochowski, A. Matuszak: “Rapid Tooling: the State of the Art”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 106, , 2000


22. www.instron.in/ [Accessed Feb 27, 2013]


23. http://www.3trpd.co.uk/sls.htm. [Accessed March 10, 2013].


24. http://www.3dsystems.com/materials/duraformr-pa[Accessed March 10, 2013].