Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

It is important to have students’ feedback on the quality of education and perception about the teaching faculty as with increasing technology; scenario is changing in the academic institutes.So, the institute may incorporate the advanced learning objectives with the changing technologies. Students’ feedback taken considering various attributes so that they can provide the necessary information to be healthy enough in analyzing the behavior and perception of the students towards the faculty of the institute. Data was collected from a sample of the population within the university. In this paper, students’ feedback analyzed using traditional assessment and code analysis. Further it is analyzed that it helps in achieving improvement in learning process and involving the students in their own development to enhance the power of knowledge. Results obtained from the collected data reveals that knowledge base and sincerity of the teacher rated highest by undergraduate and postgraduate students respectively, whereas interest generation is rated lowest by both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Keywords

Assessment; Feedback; Postgraduate; Student Perception; Undergraduate

1. D Boud, E Molloy. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design, Assess Evaluation Higher Education 38(6), 2013, 698–712


2. D Carless. Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice, Assess Evaluation Higher Education 31(4), 2006, 395–398


3. F Dochy, M Segers, D Sluijsmans. The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review, Studies in Higher Education 24, 1999, 331–350


4. A Giles, S Martin, D Bryce, G Hendry. Students as partners in evaluation: student and teacher perspectives, Assess Evaluation Higher Education 29(6), 2004, 681–685


5. D Hounsell D. Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In: Rethinking assessment in higher education, Learning for the longer term. Routledge, London 2007, 101–113


6. D Nicol, DMacFarlane-Dick. Formative assessment and self -regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education 31(2), 2006, 199–218


7. P Orsmond, S Merry, K Reiling. The use of student-derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assess Evaluation Higher Education 25(1), 2000, 21–38


8. M Patri. The influence of peer feedback on self and peer assessment of oral skills, Language Testing 19(2), 2002, 109–131


9. R Ruegg. Differences in the Uptake of Peer and Teacher Feedback, RELC Journal 46(2), 2015, 131–145,


10. Ion. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 10(11), 2016


11. S Sluijsmans, S Brand-Gruwel, J Merriënboer.Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions, Assess Evaluation Higher Education 27(5), 2002, 443–454


12. J Strijbos, S Narciss, K Dünnebier, Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?, Learning and instruction 20(4), 2010, 291–303


13. M Wen, C Tsai. University students perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment, Higher Education 51, 2006, 27–44


14. M Wen, C Tsai, C Chang.Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers, Innovative Education Teaching Institute 43(1), 2006, 83–92


15. Peter A Cohen. Effectiveness of Student-Rating Feedback for Improving College Instruction: A Meta-Analysis of Findings; Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 1980, 321-341


16. G Ion, Aleix Barrera-Corominas, Marina Tomàs-Folch. Written peer-feedback to enhance students’ current and future learning, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2016, 1-11.