Journal Press India®

MANTHAN: Journal of Commerce and Management
Vol 12 , Issue 1 , January - June 2025 | Pages: 123-143 | Research Paper

Drivers of Banking Chabot Adoption by M-Banking Customers: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Anil Payeng, Research scholar , Department of Commerce, Rajiv Gandhi University , Itanagar , Arunachal Pradesh, India (anil.payang@rgu.ac.in)
2. Devi Baruah, Assistant professor, Department of Commerce, Rajiv Gandhi University, Ziro, Arunachal Pradesh, India (devi.baruah@rgu.ac.in)

This study examines the factors influencing the adoption of banking chatbots among mobile banking customers of three major Indian banks—State Bank of India (SBI), ICICI Bank, and HDFC Bank—using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). Data from 300 chatbot users, collected via street intercepts in urban and semi-urban India from January to March 2025, were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and NCA. Results confirm that Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) significantly drive Behavioral Intention (BINT), which in turn predicts Customer Adoption (CA). NCA reveals BINT and PEOU as necessary and sufficient conditions, while PU is necessary but not sufficient beyond a threshold. Mediation analyses highlight partial roles for BINT and PEOU. Findings align with prior research while extending TAM to the Indian context, offering practical insights for enhancing chatbot design and adoption. Limitations include the cross-sectional design and focus on three banks, suggesting avenues for longitudinal and cross-cultural research.

Keywords

Banking chatbots; Technology acceptance model; Necessary condition analysis; Mobile banking; India

  1. Abdallah, W., Harraf, A., Mousa, O. & Sartawi, A. (2023). Investigating factors impacting customer acceptance of artificial intelligence chatbot: Banking sector of Kuwait. International Journal of Applied Research in Management and Economics, 6(1), 1-13.
  2. Adam, M. T. P., Wessel, M. & Benlian, A. (2020). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 30(2), 383–402.
  3. Ba, S. & Wang, X. (2021). Artificial intelligence in financial services: Customer trust and adoption. Journal of Financial Technology and Innovation, 4(2), 78-92.
  4. Brandtzaeg, P. B. & Følstad, A. (2017). Why people use chatbots. In Internet Science: 4th International Conference, INSCI 2017, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 22-24, 2017, Proceedings 4(pp. 377-392). Springer International Publishing.
  5. Chakraborty, S. & Sengupta, K. (2014). Banking services and customer satisfaction in public and private sector banks in India. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 4(5), 52–63.
  6. Chauhan, V., Choudhary, V. & Mathur, S. (2016). Demographic influences on technology adoption behavior: A study of e-banking services in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(5), 45-59.
  7. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
  8. Costa, S., Silva, E. & De Cicco, R. (2023). The role of trust in chatbot adoption: Implications for digital consumer engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107654.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  10. De Cicco, R., Silva, S. C. & Alparone, F. R. (2020). AI-driven banking chatbots: Consumer adoption and trust perspectives. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(6), 1201-1220.
  11. Dul, J. (2016). Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10-52.
  12. Folstad, A. & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2017). Chatbots and the new world of HCI. Interactions, 24(4), 38–42.
  13. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),  39–50.
  14. Garrity, E. J. & Sanders, G. L. (2019). Information systems success measurement. IGI Global. Retrieved from DOI: 10.4018/978-1-878289-03-2
  15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
  17. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  18. Hill, J., Randolph Ford, W., & Farreras, I. G. (2015). Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 245–250.
  19. Hoehle, H. & Venkatesh, V. (2020). Mobile application usability: Conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 1–31.
  20. Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  21. Huang, M. H., Rust, R. T. & Maksimovic, V. (2018). The feeling economy: Managing in the next generation of AI. California Management Review, 61(4), 43–65.
  22. Irfan, M., Akhtar, N., Ahmad, M. & Shahzad, F. (2023). Acceptance and use of artificial intelligence and AI-based technologies in education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TAM and UTAUT studies. Information Development, 39(2), 1-18.
  23. Jain, M., Kumar, P., Kota, R. & Patel, S. N. (2018). Evaluating and informing the design of chatbots. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12.
  24. Kapoor, A., Vij, P. & Kaur, G. (2021). Understanding the adoption of chatbots: Insights from UTAUT model. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 100020.
  25. Kukina, E., Van der Aalst, W. M. & Leopold, H. (2020). Using process mining to improve chatbot performance. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(3), 209–222.
  26. Kulkarni, V., Prashar, S. & Sadarangani, P. (2020). Chatbot adoption in banking: Examining the role of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Journal of Business Research, 118, 372-379.
  27. Lee, H., Hsu, C. & Yang, S. (2020). Exploring the determinants of AI Chatbot adoption in banking services: An integrated TAM approach. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 25(4), 273-289.
  28. Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z. & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers in AI-driven banking: The impact of Chatbots on customer experience. Journal of Service Research, 22(1), 42-61.
  29. Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z. & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of AI chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937–947.
  30. Makudza, F. (2024). Does artificial intelligence (AI) boost digital banking user satisfaction and loyalty? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(1), 1-12.
  31. Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing research: An applied prientation. Pearson.
  32. Mehta, V., Chauhan, V. & Choudhary, V. (2022). Understanding consumer behavior toward messenger chatbots: The role of trust, perceived usefulness, and ease of use. Journal of Business Research, 145, 205–215.
  33. Meyer, V. W., Hobert, S. & Schumann, M. (2020). How may I help you? State of the art and open research questions for chatbots at the digital workplace. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 62(3), 311–325.
  34. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  35. Praveen, S., Mishra, N., Srivastava, S. & Shivani, S. (2024). Banking with Chatbots: The role of demographic and personality traits. FIIB Business Review. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145241227757
  36. Reserve Bank of India. (2022). Annual report on mobile banking trends. RBI Press.
  37. Reserve Bank of India. (2024). Digital banking statistics 2024. RBI Press.
  38. Shankar, V., Kleijnen, M., Ramanathan, S., Rizley, R., Holland, S. & Morrissey, S. (2020). How technology is changing consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–44.
  39. Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M. & Chatla, S. B. (2019). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 105,         140–164.
  40. Shum, H. P. H., He, H. & Li, K. (2018). From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(1), 10–26.
  41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  42. Wael, M., Ahmed, K. & Hassan, R. (2023). AI Chatbot quality and user needs in banking: Exploring the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Journal of Financial Technology & Innovation, 5(3), 45-62.
  43. Wang, Y., Chen, C. & Liang, L. (2021). Exploring factors influencing consumer adoption of WeChat Pay: An empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102558.
  44. Zhang, R. W., Liang, X. & Wu, S. H. (2024). When chatbots fail: exploring user coping following a chatbots-induced service failure. Information Technology and People, 37(8), 175-195.
  45. Zhou, T., Lu, Y. & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767.
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 1

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.