Journal Press India®

Subsidies and Fiscal Deficit in Post Reforms India

Vol 1, Issue 1, January - June 2014 | Pages: 59-73 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/manthan.v1i1.2433


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. Jasoda Jena, Department of Economics, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India
2. * Chittaranjan Nayak, Department of Economics, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India (chittaranjan.ru@gmail.com)

The Government of India has been subsidising various economic goods, mainly food, fertiliser and petroleum. It is argued that subsidies are responsible for persistent high fiscal deficit over the years. The present paper attempts to study the trend of major subsidies given by the Government of India, and then examines whether all the forms of subsidies are uniformly responsible for fiscal deficit or otherwise. Based on annual time series data from 1992-93 to 2012-13, the study observes that in the post-reforms period, food and fertiliser subsidies have grown at a sharper rate than petroleum subsidies. The regression results also confirm that food and fertiliser subsidies have a positive and significant impact on fiscal deficit. The analysis of petroleum subsidies is more complicated. If we see only the explicit subsidies for petroleum products, then their rise is not significant over the post-reforms period, except for 2008-12. However, when we include the under-recoveries of Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs), the story of petroleum subsidies becomes completely different. While the effectiveness of subsidies vis-à-vis their fiscal burden need a detailed scrutiny, the present paper argues for a National Policy on Subsidies.

Keywords

Subsidies, Fiscal deficit, Augmented Dickey-Fuller test

  1. Anand, Rahul, Coady, David, Mohammad, Adil, Thakoor, Vimal & Walsh, James P. (2013). The fiscal and welfare impacts. International Monetary Fund (IMF), working paper, WP/13/128. May
  2. Arze, Del Granado, Coady, J., D. & Gillingham, R. (2012). The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: A review of evidence for developing countries. World Development, 40(11): 2234-48.
  3. Bhattacharya, B.B. & Batra, A. (2009). Fuel pricing policy reform in India: Implications and way forward”. Economic and Political Weekly. XLIV(29), 77-86, July.
  4. Coady, D., Gillingham, R., Ossowski, R., Piotrowski, J., Tareq, S. and Tyson, J. (2010). Petroleum product subsidies: Costly, inequitable, and rising, IMF Staff Position Note, SPN/10/0. IMF, Washington, DC. Retail price data retrieved April 12th, 2012. from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/spn/2010/data/spn1005.csv
  5. Dutta B., & Ramaswami, B. (2001). Targeting and efficiency in the public distribution system: Case of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly. May 5, 1524–32.
  6. Fan, S., Gulati, A.  & Thorat, S. (2007). Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India”. IFPRI Discussion Paper 716. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
  7. GoI (2012). Union Budget – Various Issues from 2002-03 to 2012-13. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.
  8. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2012). India’s Fuel Subsidies: Q & A.. Global Subsidies Initiative. IISD. Canada.
  9. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2012a). Fossil-fuel subsidy reform in India: Cash transfers for PDS kerosene and domestic LPG. Global Subsidies Initiative. IISD Canada.
  10. Jha, Shikha & Ramaswami, B. (2010). How can food subsidies work better? Answers from India and the Philippines. ADB Economics Working Paper series No 221, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.
  11. Mane, Rahul Prahlad (2006). Targeting the poor or poor targeting: A case for strengthening the Public Distribution System in India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 41(4): 299-317.
  12. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. (2012). Indian Petroleum and Natural Gas Statistics, 2010–11. New Delhi. Economic Division. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India.
  13. Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell (2011). Fiscal Subsidy on PDS Kerosene and Domestic LPG. New Delhi: Government of India. May 3. Retrieved from http://ppac.org.in.
  14. PMEAC (2012). Economic Outlook 2012/13. Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, New Delhi, August 2012.
  15. Sharma, Vijay Paul (2012). Food subsidy in India: Trends, causes and policy reform options. Working Paper 2012-08-02. IIM, Ahmedabad.
  16. Swaminathan, M (2000). Consumer food subsidies in India: Proposals for reform”, Journal of Peasant Studies, 27 (3): 92-114.
Abstract Views: 301
PDF Views: 157

Advanced Search

News/Events

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.