Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

This paper is an effort to compare the earnings based and cash flow based methods of valuation of an enterprise. The theoretically equivalent methods based on either earnings such as Residual Earnings Model (REM), Abnormal Earnings Growth Model (AEGM), Residual Operating Income Method (ReOIM), Abnormal Operating Income Growth Model (AOIGM) and its extensions multipliers such as  Price/Earnings Ratio, Price/Book Value Ratio; or cash flow based models such as Dividend Valuation Method (DVM) and Free Cash Flow method (FCFM) all provide different estimates of valuation of the Indian giant corporate Reliance India Limited (RIL). An ex-post analysis of published accounting and financial data for four financial years from 2008-09 to 2011-12 has been conducted. A comparison of these valuation estimates with the actual market capitalization of the company shows that the complex accounting based model AOIGM provides closest forecasts. These different estimates may be derived due to inconsistencies in discount rate, growth rates and the other forecasted variables. Although inputs for earnings based models may be available to the investor and analysts through published statements, precise estimation of free cash flows may be better undertaken by the internal management. The estimation of value from more stable parameters as Residual operating income and RNOA could be considered superior to the valuations from more volatile return on equity.

Keywords

Earnings, Cash flows, valuation

Barker, R. (1999). The role of dividends in valuation models used by analysts and fund managers. The European Accounting Review, 8(2): 195-218.

Bhojraj, S., & C. Lee. (2002). Who is my peer? A Valuation-based approach to the selection of comparable firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2): 407-439.

Block, S. (1999). A study of financial analysts: Practice and theory. Financial Analysts Journal, 86-95.

Clubb, C. (2005). An empirical study of the information content of accounting earnings, funds flows and cash flows in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22: 35-52.

Dechow, P. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18: 3-42.

Demirakos, E., N. Strong, & M., Walker. (2004). What valuation models do analysts use? Accounting Horizons, 18(4): 221-240.

Easton, P., Harris T., & J. Ohlson. (1992). Aggregate accounting earnings can explain most of security returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15: 119-142.

Feltham, G. & J. Ohlson. (1995). Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 689-711.

Francis, J., P. Olsson & D. Oswald. (2000). Comparing the accuracy and explainabilty of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1): 45-70. 

Frankel, R., & C. Lee. (1998). Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(3): 283-319.

Imam, S., R. Barker, & C. Clubb. (2008). The use of valuation models by UK investment analysts. European Accounting Review, 17(3): 503-535.

Liu, J., D. Nissim, & J. Thomas. (2002). Equity valuation using multiples. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1): 135-172.

Ohlson, J. (1995). Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11: 661-687.

Penman, S., & T. Sougiannis. (1998). A comparison of dividend, cash flow and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15: 343-383.