Journal Press India®

Computology: Journal of Applied Computer Science and Intelligent Technologies
Vol 6 , Issue 1 , January - June 2026 | Pages: 1-28 | Research Paper

Integrating Internet of Thing (IoT) Technologies into Forensic Science: Advancements, Applications and Challenges in Crime Scene Investigation

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Ria Ghosh, Research Scholar , Digital Forensics and Cybersecurity, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Delhi, Delhi, India (ria2024ghosh@gmail.com)
2. Sreenath Sreekantan, Emergency Medicine Doctor, Medicine , National Heath Service (NHS) , England, United Kingdom (s.sreekantan@nhs.net)

The actual-time introduction of IoT technologies in the modern life has certainly changed the sphere of forensic science, and especially in the realm of crime scene investigation. This manuscript will provide an in-depth account of the development, existing uses and the limitations that come with the use of IoT data in forensics. As seen in the discussion, the real-time monitoring, geolocation, and automatics of a networked device can help to protect evidence, profile suspected criminals, and recreate a crime with more accuracy. Legal and ethical aspects including the privacy, use of IoT based data in the courts as evidence and technology challenges of encryption, protection of data and interoperability, the Future of AI, Blockchain, and Edge Computing in IoT-Based Forensic Analysis are also included in this study. Incorporated within the framework of modern case studies and innovative application, the article explains the revolutionary nature of the use of the IoTs in forensics and its evolution and the need to adopt solid, standardised and responsible practices. The conclusions are expected to enlighten the practitioners and policymakers on the revolution of forensic science in the 21st century which will ultimately offer increased efficacy, usefulness, and jurisprudence in the crime scene investigations.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT); Digital forensics; Smart devices; Geolocation tracking; Artificial intelligence; Crime scene investigation; Digital evidence; Legal admissibility

  1. Abomhara, M. & Koien, G. M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 4(1), 65-88.
  2. Ahmed, A. A., Farhan, K., Jabbar, W. A., Al-Othmani, A. & Abdulrahman, A. G. (2024). IoT forensics: Current perspectives and future directions. Sensors, 24(16), 5210. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165210  
  3. Alanazi, A. (2025). Intelligent IoT forensics: Secure evidence acquisition and autonomous intrusion detection. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(5), 1167-1181. Retrieved https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i5.9078
  4. Alazab, A., Khraisat, A. & Singh, S. (2025). A review on the internet of things (IoT) forensics: Challenges, techniques, and evaluation of digital forensic tools. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109840
  5. Al-Hussaeni, K., Brits, J., Praveen, M., Yaqoob, A. & Karamitsos, I. (2023). A review of internet of things (IoT) forensics frameworks and models. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_37
  6. Al-Masri, E., Bai, Y. & Li, J. (2018). A fog-based digital forensics investigation framework for IoT systems. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartCloud.2018.00040
  7. Altaha, S. & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Internet of things forensic: Contemporary issues, challenges, and future research directions. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 14, 2735–2751. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v14i4.8716
  8. Atlam, H. F., Ekuri, N., Azad, M. A. & Lallie, H. S. (2024). Blockchain forensics: A systematic literature review of techniques, applications, challenges, and future directions. Electronics, 13(17), 3568. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13173568
  9. Atlam, H. F., Hemdan, E. E., Alenezi, A., Alassafi, M., & Wills, G. (2020). Internet of Things forensics: A review. Internet of Things, 11, Article 100220. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100220
  10. Avila, R. G., Miller, F. & Iyengar, S. (2024). Current challenges in IoT security and forensics: Strategies for a secure connected future. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5772/ intechopen.1007766
  11. Baho, S. A., & Abawajy, J. (2023). Analysis of Consumer IoT Device Vulnerability Quantification Frameworks. Electronics, 12(5), 1176. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.33 90/electronics12051176
  12. Brotsis, S., Grammatikakis, K. P., Kavallieros, D., Mazilu, A. I., Kolokotronis, N., Limniotis, K., & Vassilakis, C. (2023). Blockchain meets Internet of Things (IoT) forensics: A unified framework for IoT ecosystems. Internet of Things, 24, Article 100968. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100968
  13. Brotsis, S., Kolokotronis, N., Limniotis, K., Shiaeles, S., Kavallieros, D., Bellini, E., & Pavue, C. (2019). Blockchain solutions for forensic evidence preservation in IoT environments. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization, 110–114.
  14. Conti, M., Dehghantanha, A., Franke, K., & Watson, S. (2018). Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 544–546. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.11.031
  15. Fagbola, F. I. & Venter, H. S. (2022). Smart digital forensic readiness model for shadow IoT devices. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 730. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/app 12020730
  16. Ghasemi, J., & Mahmoudi, N. (2024). The application of IoT devices in evidence collection and preservation in legal investigations in the common law legal system of Western countries. Proceedings of the 2024 IST Conference, 120–124. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/IST64061.2024.10843627
  17. Granjal, J., Monteiro, E., & Silva, J. S. (2015). Security for the Internet of Things: A survey of existing protocols and open research issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(3), 1294–1312. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2388550
  18. Grispos, G., Studiawan, H., & Alrabaee, S. (2024). Internet of Things (IoT) forensics and incident response: The good, the bad, and the unaddressed. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 48, Article 301671. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.20 23.301671
  19. Islam, M., Mahin, M., Khatun, A., Debnath, B., & Kabir, S. (2019). Digital forensic investigation framework for Internet of Things (IoT): A comprehensive approach. Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT), 1–6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICASERT.2019.8934707
  20. Islam, M., Mahin, M., Khatun, A., Roy, S., Kabir, S. & Debnath, B. (2019). A comprehensive data security and forensic investigation framework for cloud-IoT ecosystem.
  21. Kandwal, N. (2024). Experiencing IoT forensics in 2024: Navigating the latest trends. Retrieved from https://karnavatiuniversity.edu.in/experiencing-iot-forensics-in-2024-naviga ting-the-latest-trends/
  22. Kaushik, K., Bhardwaj, A. & Dahiya, S. (2023). Smart home IoT forensics: Current status, challenges, and future directions. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control Technology (InCACCT), 716–721. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/InCACCT57535.2023.10141730
  23. Kumar, G., Saha, R., Lal, C. & Conti, M. (2021). Internet-of-Forensic (IoF): A blockchain based digital forensics framework for IoT applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 120, 433–450. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.02.016
  24. Mahmood, H., Arshad, M., Ahmed, I., Fatima, S. & Ur Rehman, H. (2024). Comparative study of IoT forensic frameworks. Digital Investigation, 49, 301748. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301748
  25. Mahmood, H., Arshad, M., Ahmed, I., Fatima, S., & Rehman, H. U. (2024). Comparative study of IoT forensic frameworks. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 49, Article 301748. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301748
  26. Mahmoud, R., Yousuf, T., Aloul, F., & Zualkernan, I. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT) security: Current status, challenges, and prospective measures. Proceedings of the 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), 336–341.
  27. Mahmud, H., Ragib, H. & Shams, Z. (2017). Trust-IoV: A trustworthy forensic investigation framework for the internet of vehicles (IoV). Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.1109/IEEE.ICIOT.2017.13
  28. Mazhar, M. S., Saleem, Y., Almogren, A., Arshad, J., Jaffery, M. H., Rehman, A. U., Shafiq, M. & Hamam, H. (2022). Forensic analysis on Internet of Things (IoT) device using machine-to-machine (M2M) framework. Electronics, 11(7), 1126. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11071126
  29. Mishra, N. & Pandya, S. (2021). Internet of Things applications, security challenges, attacks, intrusion detection, and future visions: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 9, 59353–59377. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073408
  30. Mukhtar, B. I., Elsayed, M. S., Jurcut, A. D. & Azer, M. A. (2023). IoT vulnerabilities and attacks: SILEX malware case study. Symmetry, 15(11), 1978. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111978
  31. Nawir, M., Amir, A., Yaakob, N., & Lynn, O. B. (2016). Internet of Things (IoT): Taxonomy of security attacks. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED), 321–326.
  32. Nieto, A., Rios, R., & Lopez, J. (2017). A methodology for privacy-aware IoT-forensics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.293
  33. Oriwoh, E., Jazani, D., Epiphaniou, G. & Sant, P. (2013). Internet of Things forensics: Challenges and approaches. Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2013.254159
  34. Perumal, S., Norwawi, N., & Raman, V. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT) digital forensic investigation model: Top-down forensic approach methodology. Proceedings of the 2015 Fifth International Conference on Digital Information Processing and Communications (ICDIPC), 19–23.
  35. Rudrakar, S., Rughani, P., & Sadineni, L. (2025). Digital forensics and incident response management model for IoT based agriculture. Scientific reports, 15(1), 17797. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02635-2
  36. Servida, F., & Casey, E. (2019). IoT forensic challenges and opportunities for digital traces. Digital Investigation, 28, S22–S29. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.20 19.01.012
  37. Sharma, S., Malik, A. & Sharma, A. (2023). A survey on blockchain based IoT forensic evidence. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37763 4112_A_survey_on_blockchain_based_IoT_forensic_evidence
  38. Silva, T. J., Oliveira Jr., E., Pereira, M. E., & Zorzo, A. F. (2025). A review study of digital forensics in IoT: Process models, phases, architectures, and ontologies. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 53, Article 301912.
  39. Sivanathan, A. (2020). IoT behavioral monitoring via network traffic analysis [Preprint]. ArXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10632
  40. Sivaraman, V., Gharakheili, H. H., Vishwanath, A., Boreli, R., & Mehani, O. (2015). Network-level security and privacy control for smart-home IoT devices. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 163–167.
  41. Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things — New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(1), 23–30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.20 09.11.008
  42. Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Ahmed, A. & Kazmi, S.M.A. (2019). Choong Seon Hong, Internet of things forensics: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.09.058.
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 43

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.