Role of Social Capital in Good Governance the Case of Prdp in Bangladesh

Mr. Mihir Kumar Roy; Mr. Mizanur Rahman

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v16i2.162201520

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Board Members

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

Role of Social Capital in Good Governance the Case of Prdp in Bangladesh

Mihir Kumar Roy, Mizanur Rahman

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v16i2.162201520

Published Online: November 27, 2015

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Mihir Kumar Roy, Professorr & Dean, City University, Panthapath Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh (mihir.city@gmail.com)

2. Mizanur Rahman, Joint Director, Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development, (BARD) Kotbari, Comilla,, Dhaka, Bangladesh (mizan_bard@yahoo.com)

The study was undertaken with the objective of identifying the institutional mechanisms for promoting transparency, accountability, and villagers’ participation in Gram Committee (GC) activities under Participatory Rural Development Project (PRDP) link model that emanated from creation of social capital in rural society; and to test a research question i.e., does formation of social capital contribute to better implementation of GC activities under PRDP link model?

Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was primarily based on qualitative analysis. Data were collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data were collected from Chairman, Vice-Chairman, secretary, male and female members of GCs, NBDs extension agents, UP representatives and secretaries, general villagers and project officials. Secondary data were collected by applying content analysis method through looking into project documents, brochures, research reports, GC and UCC resolution, GC guidelines, scheme preparation and approval documents, scheme application form, declaration from for giving soil and land by the land owners for GC scheme, attendance register of GC and relevant books were consulted.

Findings: The study revealed that the prolonged intervention of PRDP link model helped formation of social capital in the study area through imbuement and better internalization of a sense of cooperation; togetherness; mutual trust, communication and network; solidarity, developing relationship and interactions among the community activities performed by the GC, which was in fact the pivotal institution of PRDP for ushering development and transformation at the grassroots.

Research Implications: It appeared that formation of social capital contributed to GC becoming a relatively effective and socially viable institution for local development that demanded better governance in GC, which ultimately facilitated better implementation of PRDP model in the project villages. It was found that the institutional mechanisms of promoting transparency, accountability to the villagers, and community participation in GC are embedded in the process of formation of GC.

Practical Implications: During its long time implementation, GC has found a sustainable process of local development through donor’s support. But in Bangladesh, it has become a common phenomenon that such donor supported best practices end with the withdrawal of donor support and termination of implementation phase. Although, overtime GC developed social capital in the project villages but withdrawal support from the donor may inhibit its self-sustaining strength due to lack of matching grant system and its other unique mechanism of PRDP model. Most of the time, experiences and lessons learnt from such donor’s support based best practices cannot be properly utilized due to lack of strong advocacy and adopting appropriate means for mainstreaming it nation-wide as such project experiments suffer from the basic problem of sustainability.

Keywords

Social Capital, Governance, Participatory Rural Development, Nation Building Departments, Gram Committee, Union Development Officer.

Adam, F. & Roncevic, B. (2003). Social capital: Recent debates and research trends, Social Science Information, 42(2), 155-183.
Bankston, C.L. & Zhou, M. (2002). Social capital as a process: The meanings and problems of a theoretical metaphor, Sociological Inquiry, 72(2), 285-317.
BRDB/JICA (2008). G.C. and UCC Scheme Guideline, PRDP-2, Dhaka: BRDB/JICA.
Brewer, Gene A. (2003). Building social capital: Civic attitudes and behavior of public servants, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 5-26.
Dolfsma, Wilfred & Charlie, Dannreuther (2003). Subjects and boundaries: Contesting social capital-based policies, Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 405-413.
Emmanuel, L. & Phillipa, E.P. ( 2001). Social capital as social mechanisms and collective assets: The example of status auctions among colleagues, in Ronald Burt (edited). Social Capital: Theory and Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Foley, Michael W. & Bob, Edwards (1997). Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital Debate, American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 550-561.
Field, J. (2003). Social capital : An overview & introduction, U.S.A.: H. University Press.
Grootaert, C. & Bastelaer, T.V. (2002). Conclusion: Measuring impact and drawing policy implications, pp.341-350 in The Role of Social Capital in Development (ed) by Bastelaer, T.V., Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V.N., & Woolcok, M. (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire, World Bank Working Paper No.18, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Helmut. A. & Kendall, J. (2002). Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations, British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343-362.
Heffron, J.M. (2000). Beyond community and society: The externalities of social capital building. Policy Sciences, 33(3), 477-494.
Karen, H. & Hampshire, A. (2002). Social capital: A useful concept for social work?. Australian Social Work, 55(3), 227-238.
Knack, S. (2002). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the states, American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 772-785.
Krishna, A. & Uphoff, N. ( 2002). Mapping and measuring social capital through assessment of collective action to conserve and develop watersheds in Rajasthan, India, in Thierry Van Bastelaer (edited) 2002. The Role of Social Capital in Development, (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).
Manasan, R.G., Gonzalez, E.T., & Gaffud, R.B. (1999). Indicators of good governance: Developing an index of governance quality at LGU level, The Journal of Philippines Development, 26(48), 149-212.
Michael, A.H., Lee, H.U., & Yucel, E. (2002). The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among asian and western firms, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19(2), 353-372.
Narayan, D. & Lant, P. (1999). Social capital: Evidence and implications, in Ismail Serageldin. (edited). Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Narayan, D. (2002). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty, Sunder Ramaswamy (edited) 2002 in Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-being in Developing Countries, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Portes, A. & Julia, S. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action, American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
Portes, A. & Patricia, L. (1996). The downside of social capital, The American Prospect, 26(1), 18-23.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R.N. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R.N. (1993/1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital, Journal of Democracy, 6(4), 65-78.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Robison, L.J., Schmid, A.A., & Marcelo, E.S. (2002). Is social capital really capital?” Review of Social Economy, 60(1), 1-21.
Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development, European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 427-442. UNDP (1993). Human Development Report 1993, New York: UNDP.
Uphoff, N. & Wijayaratna, C.M. (2000). Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka, World Development, 28(11), 1875-1890.
Uphoff, N. (1999). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation, in Ismail Serageldin (edited) 1999. Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Wallis, A., Jarle, P. C., & Schechter, B. (1998). Social capital and community building, Part 1, National Civic Review, 87(2), 253-72.
Wallis, A. (1998). Social capital and community building, building healthier communities: Ten years of learning, Part 2, National Civic Review, 87(2), 317-19.
Watson, G.W. & Papamarcos, S.D. (2002). Social capital and organizational commitment, Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(4), 537-552.
Watson, I. (2000a). Major themes and debates in the social capital literature: The Australian connection, in Ian Winter (edited). 2000. Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne: National Library of Australia.
Winter, I. (2000b). Social capital and public policy in context, in Ian Winter (edited) 2000. Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne: National Library of Australia.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework, Theory and Society, 27(1), 151-208.
World Bank (1999 January 15). What is social capital?, Retrieved from: www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/whatsc.htm.
World Bank (2002). Promoting social and public accountability – Participatory and community based monitoring and evaluation, (Uganda Videoconference: World Bank).