Penetration of Digital Media in Indian Democracy

Prof. Navodita Pande; Prof. Ashrita Shukla

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v17i2.172201607

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Advisory Board

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

Penetration of Digital Media in Indian Democracy

Navodita Pande, Ashrita Shukla

Vol 17 , Issue 2 , July - December 2016 | Pages: 87-101 | Research Paper

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v17i2.172201607

Published Online: November 30, 2016

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Navodita Pande, Assistant Professor, Jagran Institute of Management & Mass Communication, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Ashrita Shukla, Assistant Professor, Jagran Institute of Management & Mass Communication, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Purpose: Indian elections 2014 have strongly used digital media in their campaign. In fact, it is assumed that the key to BJP’s success was the engagement achieved with supporters, through the use of social mediums. Therefore, this study aims to understand the influence of digital political marketing among youth. The study also helps to identify the political objectives achieved through digital marketing. Although things started late in India but geared up very soon and surpassed many benchmarks in the world of digitization.

Methodology: The research is based upon Questionnaire. Sample include 80 youths from different spheres whom set of few questions were asked. Research questions would depend upon the following objective: (i) To understand the influence of digital political marketing among youth, (ii) Effectiveness of online tools in targeting youth for political purpose, (iii) Identification of political objectives achieved through digital marketing, (iv) Assessment of implementation of various policies through digital media, (v) Assessment of accessibility of such digital marketing tools.

Findings: Political parties have strongly used social media which helped them to state their ideologies in a better way. Political campaigning through internet has wild fire effect in terms of spreading messages and to engage with audience rather than manipulating them in their decision making skills.

Research Limitations: The accuracy of analysis is dependent on accuracy of data. Respondents might answer superficially.

Practical Implications: Digital media is playing a considerable role in Indian democracy so this study would probably help to understand more, the use of digital media in different corporations especially in politics. This study might facilitate academicians to get the perspective of digital political marketing among youth.

Originality: There has been sufficient research articles focussing upon impact, growth, effect, etc., of digital media on youth. Even talking about digital literacy wouldn’t be new. But through this paper we found that how much digital political marketing is influential among youth. This study would probably be the first to identify political objectives achieved through digital marketing and also help to assess, if this media is really helpful to implement the various political policies.

Keywords

Digital Hiteracy, Digital Marketing, Digital Media, Political Marketing.

Aaker, D. (2012). Branding a New Offering: The Brand Relationship Spectrum. Prophet. Retrieved from http://www.prophet.com/2016/07/270-branding-a-new-offering-the-brand-relationship-spectrum/, Accessed on January 24, 2016.
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Santa Barbara, California: Cambridge University Press.
Bonchek, M.S. (1995). Grassroots in cyberspace: Using computer networks to facilitate political participation. Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http:/www.ai.mit.edu/people/msb/pubs/grassroots.htm, Accessed on January 25, 2016.
Carlisle, J.E., & Patton, R.C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883-895.
Caywood, C.L., & Preston, I. (1989). The continuing debate on political advertising: Toward a jeopardy theory of political advertising as regulated speech. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 8, 204-226. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30000321, Accessed on 24th January, 2016.
Guillén, M.F., & Suárez, S.L. (2005). Explaining the global digital divide: Economic, political and sociological drivers of cross-national Internet use. Social Forces, 84(2), 681-708.
Howard, P.N. (2005). Deep democracy, thin citizenship: The impact of digital media in political campaign strategy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 153-170.
Kahne, J., Lee, N.J., & Feezell, J.T. (2012). Digital Media Literacy Education and Online Civic and Political Participation. International Journal of Communication, 6(2012), 1-24.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of Marketing. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Lilleker, D., & Scullion, R. (2008). Voters or Consumers: Imagining the contemporary electorate. Angerton Gardens, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pande, S. (2014). Just the Right Image. Business Today, Delhi, June 8.
Scammell, M. (2007). Political brands and consumer citizens: The rebranding of Tony Blair. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 61(1), 176-192.