Disruptive  Innovation, Management, and Public Administration: A Bibliometric Study

Aditya P. Tripathi; Noopur Agrawal

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v24i1.241202305

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Advisory Board

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

Disruptive Innovation, Management, and Public Administration: A Bibliometric Study

Aditya P. Tripathi, Noopur Agrawal

Vol 24 , Issue 1 , January - June 2023 | Pages: 49-64 | Research Paper

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v24i1.241202305

Published Online: June 03, 2023

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Aditya P. Tripathi, Professor, Department of Commerce, Shyam Lal College (Evening), University of Delhi, Delhi, India (aptripathi@shyamlale.du.ac.in)

2. Noopur Agrawal, Professor, Department of Commerce, Shaheed Bhagat Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India (noopur.agrawal@sbs.du.ac.in)

Purpose: The objective of this paper is to analyze the existing body of knowledge on disruptive innovation, management, and public adminis- tration and identify directions for further research. The paper used Biblio- shiny to analyze disruptive innovation, management, and public adminis- tration documents retrieved from the database of Web of Science with a time filter of 1994 to 2022 and Scopus Repository from 2010 to 2021. Design/Methodology/Approach: A bibliometric study was conducted on 404 documents retrieved from the database of the Web of Science. Further 9 documents from the SCOPUS repository with the same search key have also been included in the research. A systematic review of existing literature on ‘disruptive innovation, management, and public administration’ was performed using Biblioshiny (R Software). Findings: This paper classifies the key authors working on different themes of disruptive innovation, management, and public administration. It also provides diversified themes in terms of their centrality and relevance along with citation analysis of, a three-field plot with source-country keywords. It also offers a list of key research areas (KRAs) to conduct further research. Originality/Value: The present research explores the existing body of knowledge on disruptive innovation, management, and public administration and identifies the key areas of research in this field. It also aims to act as a point of reference for researchers working in the field of disruptive management, and public administration.

Keywords

Disruptive Innovation, Disruptive Management, Public Administration, Public Policy, Bibliometric Analysis.

AAdner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy To Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98-107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 7201007_Match_Your_Innovation_Strategy_To_Your_ Innovation_Ecosystem.

Charitou, C. D., & Markides, C. (2003). Responses to disruptive strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2), 55-63, 63A. https://www.proquest.com/ docview/2069496475.

Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple- perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309.

Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2016). State of the art on food waste research: A bibliometrics study from 1997 to 2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.085.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=46.

Christensen, C. M. (2005). The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruptio. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00180.x

Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, nd M. E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press. https:// www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=15473.

Ghezzi, A., Gastaldi, L., Lettieri, E., Martini, A., & Corso,

M. (2016). A role for startups in unleashing the disruptive power of social media. International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, 36(6), 1152-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.007%0A

Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006a). Disruptive- ness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189-199.

Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006b). The Useful- ness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12-18.

Isherwood, A., & Tassabehji, R. (2016). A Case Analysis of managing “Maverick” Innovation units. International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, 36(5), 793-798.

Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor- based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39-81. https:// doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380.

Klenner, P., Hüsig, S., & Dowling, M. (2013). Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—When are markets ready for disruptive innovations? Research Policy, Elsevier, 42(4), 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.006.

Li, P. P. (2013). Disruptive Innovation in Chinese and Indian Businesses The Strategic Implications for Local Entrepreneurs and Global Incumbents. Taylor & Francis. https://www.routledge.com/Disruptive-Innovation-in- Chinese-and-Indian-Businesses-The-Strategic- Implications/Li/p/book/9781138851948.

Nagy, D., Schuessler, J., & Dubinsky, A. (2016). Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Industrial.

Marketing Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.indmarman.2015.11.017.

Orheim, O., Press, A., & Gilbert, N. (2011). Managing the Antarctic Environment: The Evolving Role of the Committee for Environmental Protection. Science Diplomacy/ : Science, Antarctica, and the Governance of International Spaces, 1, 209-221. https://doi.org/10.5479/ si.9781935623069.209.

Pandit, D., Gupta, R. K., Sahay, A., & Joshi, M. P. (2017). Disruptive innovation through a dynamic capabilities lens: an exploration of the auto component sector in India. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 14(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1504/ ijicbm.2017.10000835.

Rafii, F., & Kampas, P. J. (2002). How to identify your enemies before they destroy you. In Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review.

Riehmann, P., Hanfler, M., & Froehlich, B. (2005). Interactive sankey diagrams. Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFO VIS, May, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532152.

Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/IMR-10-2014-0341.

Thomond, P. N., & Lettice, F. (2008). Allocating resources to disruptive innovation projects: Challenging mental models and overcoming management resistance. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.020702.

Wan, Y., Zheng, X., Chen, H., Guo, Y., Jiang, H., He, X., Zhu, X., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Splicing function of mitotic regulators links R-loop–mediated DNA damage to tumor cell killing. Journal of Cell Biology, 209(2), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201409073.

Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010). A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435-452.

Yu, D., Xu, Z., Pedrycz, W., & Wang, W. (2017). Information Sciences 1968-2016: A retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Information Sciences, 418, 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.031.