Journal Press India®

Multilateral Agreements on Investment: Lessons from the Past and the Road Ahead

Vol 2, Issue 2, July - December 2015 | Pages: 99-120 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/focus.v2i2.8625


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Pritika Dua, Assistant Professor, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India (pritikadua@gmail.com)

A multilateral agreement on investment (MAI) is an agreement between sovereign states which is meant to safeguard the investments that companies undertake in foreign countries. Given the importance of foreign direct investment, one would expect to find such an agreement on the top of every international organization’s agenda. The OECD started negotiations for such agreement in 1995 and the newly established WTO set up a working group in 1996 regarding the same. At that time, however, those attempts failed. The negotiations at the OECD were suspended in 1998 and the WTO did not move beyond TRIMS, the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures that is limited, to the subset of trade-related investments. The study traces the history of International Investment Agreements, along with their features, advantages and disadvantages. The paper takes at the chronology of the events which led to the failure of MAI. The analysis concludes with the road ahead for multilateral agreements on investment.

Keywords

Multilateral Agreement on Investment, WTO, Foreign direct investment, Capital Flows, Development.

  1. Brunner, Serge & Folly, David (2007). The way to a Multilateral Investment Agreement. NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No 2007/24.
  2. Dhar, Biswajit & Chaturvedi, Sachin. (1998). Multilateral Agreement on Investment: An Analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(15).
  3. Group of Fifteen. (1996). Sixth Summit Meeting of the Summit Level Group of Developing Countries, 3-5 November 1996, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  4. Khor, Martin. (1996). The WTO and foreign investment: Implications and alternatives for developing countries. Development in Practice, 6(4): 304-314.
  5. Kumar, Nagesh. (2001). WTO's emerging investment regime: Way forward for Doha ministerial meeting. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(33).
  6. Kumar, Nagesh. (2003). Investment on WTO agenda: A developing country perspective and way forward for Cancun Ministerial Conference. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(30).
  7. Mukherjee, Neela. (1996). Multilateral Investment Agreement and poor countries.   Economic and Political Weekly, 31(47).
  8. Nanda, Nitya. (2003). WTO and trade facilitation: Some implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(26).
  9. Sauvé, Pierre. (2006). Multilateral rules on investment: is forward movement possible? Journal of International Economic Law, 9(2).
  10. Third World Network. (1996). Negative effects of a MIA for Africa: A Seminar Paper on FDI and the Proposed Multilateral Investment Agreement. In: Briefing Paper 2, Third World Network.
  11. UNCTAD .(1996a), World Investment Report, UNCTAD, Geneva.
  12. UNCTAD. (1996b). Globalization and Liberalization, Effects of International Economic Relations on Poverty, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva.
  13. Willmann, Jiahua Chegerald. (2009). The economics of a Multilateral Investment Agreement. CESIFO Working Paper No. 2562.
  14. World Trade Organization. (1996). Foreign Direct Investment, WTO, Geneva.
Abstract Views: 162
PDF Views: 240

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.