Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Women’s employment is an imperative factor in their advancement towards economic independence yet there is relatively inadequate and mixed evidence on the relationship between economic growth and female labour force participation rates. This study examines the impact of economic growth on female workforce participation in South Asian Nations (SANs) from 2000-2015 within the outline of U-shaped hypothesis using panel data modelling. The impact of several key macro-economic variables on female labour force participation is also examined in different econometric model specifications. The effects of economic development, literacy, urbanization and different unemployment patterns on female labour force participation are found to be negative whereas Gini coefficient is found to be positive. The findings suggest that most of the SANs are still experiencing the downward portion of U-shaped (while India being close to attaining the tipping point sooner as compared to other nations) may be, due to being at the early stages of economic development. In the present scenario, policy interventions should handle a variety of issues, including reconstructing access to and significance of education and training programmes and boosting private sector development in industries and regions that would escalate job opportunities for women in developing countries.

Keywords

Female labour force participation; Economic development; U-shaped hypothesis; Fixed effects model; Dynamic panel modelling; South Asian Nations

1. Anker, R. (1998). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
2. Bardhan, P. K. (1979). Wages and unemployment in a poor agrarian economy: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 87(3), 479-500.
3. Bhalla, S., & Kaur, R. (2011). Labour force participation of women in India: Some facts, some queries. Asia Research Centre - Working paper 40.
4. Cagatay, N., & Ozler, S. (1995). Feminization of the labour force: The effects of long-term development and structural adjustment. World development, 23(11), 1883-1894.
5. Cakir, O. (2008). The relationship between economic development and female labour force participation within the framework of U-shaped hypothesis: Evidence from Turkey. Master Thesis, Department of Economics, Lund University, pp. 1-61.
6. Dasgupta, P., & Goldar, B. (2005). Female labour supply in rural India: An econometric analysis. Institute of Economic Growth Working Paper No. E/265/2005. Delhi University, Delhi.
7. Das, M., & Desai, S. (2003). Why are educated women less likely to be employed in India?: Testing competing hypotheses. Washington, DC: Social Protection, World Bank.
8. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-79.
9. Durand, J.D. (1975). The labour force in economic development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Ejaz, M. (2007). Determinants of female labor force participation in Pakistan: An empirical analysis of PSLM (2004-05) micro data. The Lahore Journal of Economics, Special edition, September, 203-235.
11. Faridi, M. Z., Malik, S., & Basit, A. B. (2009). Impact of education on female labour force participation in Pakistan: Empirical evidence from primary data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 127-140.
12. Gaddis, I., & Klasen, S. (2014). Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation. Journal of Population Economics, 27(3), 639-681.
13. Goldin, C. (1990). The gender gap: An economic history of American women. New York: Cambridge University Press, Estados Unidos.
14. Goldin, C. (1995). The U-shaped female labour force function in economic development in economic history. In Schultz, T. P. (Ed.). Investment in Women’s Human Capital and Economic Development. pp. 61-90, University of Chicago Press.
15. Kingdon, G. G., & Unni, J. (1997). Education and women's labour market outcomes in India. Education Economics, 9(2), 173-195.
16. Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. (2009). The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Feminist economics, 15(3), 91-132.
17. Klasen, S., & Pieters, J. (2012). Push or pull? Drivers of female labour force participation during India's economic boom. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6395, pp. 1-36.
18. Kottis, A.P. (1990), Shifts over time and regional variation in women’s labour force participation rates in a developing economy. Journal of Development Economics, 33(1), 117-132.
19. Lahoti, R., & Swaminathan, H. (2013). Economic growth and female labour force participation in India. IIM Bangalore Working Paper No. 414.
20. Luci, A. (2009). Female labour market participation and economic growth. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 4(2-3), 97-108.
21. Mammen, K., & Paxson, C. (2000). Women's work and economic development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 141-164.
22. Mujahid, N., & uz Zafar, N. (2012). Economic growth-female labour force participation nexus: An empirical evidence for Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 4(51), 565-585.
23. Olsen, W., & Mehta, S. (2006). Female labour participation in rural and urban India: Does housewives' work count?. Radical Statistics, 93, 57-90.
24. Pampel, F.C. & K. Tanaka (1986). Economic development and female labour force participation: A reconsideration. Social Forces, 64(3), 599-619.
25. Psacharopoulos, G. & Tzannatos, Z. (1989). Education and female labour force participation. Paper presented at World Congress of Comparative Education (6th, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 6-10).
26. Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137-145.
27. Rustagi, P. (2010). Continuing gender stereotypes or signs of change: Occupational pattern of women workers. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 53(3), 481-500.
28. Schultz, T.P. (1991), International differences in labour force participation in families and firms. Economic Growth Center working paper No. 634, New Haven: Yale University.
29. Swaminathan, M., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Workers in urban India: Changes in gender segregation of occupations, 1983-2000. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 273-292.
30. Tam, H. (2011). U-shaped female labour participation with economic development: Some panel data evidence. Economics Letters, 110(2), 140-142.
31. Tansel, A. (2001). Economic development and female labour force participation in Turkey: Time series evidence and cross-province estimates, ERC Working Papers in Economics 01/05.