Journal Press India®

Role of Institutional Integration in Economic Integration: An Examination for India in the Framework of BRICS

Vol 9 , Issue 2 , July - December 2022 | Pages: 61-77 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.focus.v9i2.922204


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Chingshubam Manimohon Singh, Assistant Professor, Economics, DM College of Commerce, Dhanamanjuri University, Imphal, Manipur, India (mani.hcu@gmail.com)
2. Nasir Ahmed Khan, Professor, School of Economics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telengana, India (drkhan58@gmail.com)
3. Mayengbam Lalit Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Kha Manipur College, Kakching, Manipur, India (may.lalit@gmail.com)

Regionalism has been popular in the twentieth century since the post-war period. Article XXIV of GATT provides opportunities for many countries across the world to form regional economic integration. It has been witnessed that such integration yields greater trade openness and deepening of the relationships among the countries in the agreement. The present paper deals with the impact of successive summits on bilateral trade openness and the deepening of India with the members of BRICS. This paper employs sophisticated econometric tools such as Granger Causality tests to check whether institutional integration causes the economic integration of India with the other members of BRICS. Further, the paper also examines trade creation and diversion of intra BRICS trade using a partial equilibrium tool called SMART.

Keywords

GATT; BRICS; AIIB; Granger Causality Test; SMART

  1. Balassa, B. (1961). The theory of economic integration. Illinois: Homewood.
  2. Castro, T.D. (2013). Trade among BRICS countries: Changes towards closer cooperation. Ekonomicka Revue – Central European Review of Economic Issues, 16, 131-147.
  3. Dorrucii, E., Agur, I. & Mongelli, F. P. (2005). What does European institutional integration tell us about trade integration? ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 40. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.807413.
  4. Frankel, J. & Rose, A. K. (1997). Is EMU more justifiable ex-post than ex-ante? European Economic Review, 41(3-5), 753-760.
  5. Laird, S., & Yeats, A. (1986). The UNCTAD trade policy simulation model, a note on methodology, data and uses. UNCTAD Discussion Paper No.19, UNCTAD. Retrieved from https://wits.world bank.org/data/public/SMART Methodology.pdf.
  6. Mongelli, F. P. (2002). New views on the optimum currency area theory: What is EMU telling us? Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.357400.
  7. Singh, M. L. (2014). Developments in India’s bilateral trade with ASEAN: A case study in manufactured sectors. FOCUS: Journal of International Business, 1(1), 108-132.
  8. Singh, M. L. (2015). Does institutional integration lead to economic integration? A case study on India-ASEAN free trade agreements. FOCUS: Journal of International Business, 2(1), 99-115.

Weblinks

  1. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country
  2. http://unctad.org/en/Pages/Statistics.aspx
  3. http://wits.worldbank.org/wits
  4. http://comtrade.un.org/db/mr/daCommodities.aspx
  5. http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/trade/index.html
  6. http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/summits/index.html
Abstract Views: 8
PDF Views: 0

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.