Journal Press India®

GBS Impact: Journal of Multi Disciplinary Research
Vol 11 , Issue 1 , January - June 2025 | Pages: 150-166 | Research Paper

Mapping Social Inclusion of Transgender People through a Bibliometric Lens

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Sony P.J., Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India (sonypjohny3@gmail.com)
2. Anbukarasi M., Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India (anbujan2011@gmail.com)

Purpose: The study aims to map the existing body of scholarly literature on the social inclusion of transgender individuals by identifying publication trends, influential authors, key journals, and recurring themes. It seeks to uncover research gaps and evolving patterns in global academic discourse related to transgender inclusion.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This review adopts a bibliometric analysis approach. Data was collected from scopus database using a defined set of keywords related to transgender inclusion and social integration. Tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny (R Studio) were used to conduct co-authorship analysis, keyword co-occurrence mapping, and trend visualization. The study covers publications from 2001 to 2024.

Findings: The results reveal a steady growth in scholarly attention toward transgender inclusion, especially post-2015. A few countries dominate the research output, with limited contributions from the Global South. Key themes include healthcare access, legal rights, social discrimination, and education. Despite increasing visibility, intersectional analyses and empirical research on non-Western contexts remain underrepresented.

Research Limitations: The analysis is limited to publications indexed in the Scopus database, which may not capture all relevant research published in non-indexed or regional journals. This could result in a bias toward well-established, English-language academic sources, potentially overlooking important contributions from underrepresented regions or local scholarship published in non-English languages. As a result, the global picture of transgender social inclusion research may be incomplete, especially in terms of culturally specific perspectives, grassroots-level insights, or policy-relevant research produced outside mainstream publishing systems.

Practical Implications: The findings provide insights for policymakers, NGOs, and academic institutions to identify knowledge gaps and prioritize underexplored areas such as transgender inclusion in employment, housing, and rural contexts. It also aids libraries and research centers in building targeted resources.

Social Implications: By highlighting underrepresented voices and themes, this study contributes to a more inclusive academic agenda. It promotes the visibility of transgender issues in global scholarship and encourages informed interventions aimed at achieving gender equity and social justice.

Originality: This is one of the few studies that applies bibliometric performance analysis to transgender social inclusion literature. It offers a data-driven perspective to assess how effectively research output supports inclusion goals and guides future academic priorities.

Keywords

Transgender, Discrimination, Gender identity, Social inclusion, SDGs, Bibliometric analysis

  1. Coleman, E., Bockting, W., Botzer, M., Cohen-Kettenis, P., DeCuypere, G., Feldman, J., Fraser, L., Green, J., Knudson, G., Meyer, W. J., Monstrey, S., Adler, R. K., Brown, G. R., Devor, A. H., Ehrbar, R., Ettner, R., Eyler, E., Garofalo, R., Karasic, D. H., ... Zucker, K. (2012). Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(4), 165–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.700873
  2. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
  3. Dragowski, E., & Phillips, J. (2015). Keeping up with transgender youth. Communiqué, 44(2), 1–19. National Association of School Psychologists.
  4. James, S. E., Herman, J. L., Rankin, S., Kriesling, M., Mottet, L., & Anafi, M. (2016). The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec 17.pdf
  5. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5. 674
  6. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs. (2015). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and HIV-affected hate violence in 2014. https://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2014_HV_Report-Final.pdf
  7. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
  8. Rondón García, L. M. (2021). Social exclusion and transgender people in Spain. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of social inclusion (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_49-1
  9. Scopus. (2020). About Scopus – Abstract and citation database. Elsevier. https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/15534/supporthub/scopus/
  10. Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5–6), 531–578
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 44

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.