Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

The debate is upon the meaning of the notions of Fantasy and Uncanny. thus on tell apart between genres or sorts discourse on counting on the context, on their purpose. The consequence could also be a large choice of definitions and notions that typically become useless or punishing to understand. Once explaining it, we would value more highly to investigate several approaches of the genre, mode or discourse of fantasy and uncanny. The aim is to go looking out and acceptable theoretical approach, for the variability of texts and contexts, within which we tend to tend to might discuss fantasy and uncanny together.

Keywords

Uncanny; Defamiliarization; Fantasy; Weird Fiction

1. Castle, Terry. (2011). Other. United States. University of Minnesota 
2. Davis,. Womack, Kenneth. (2001). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Ed. Raman Selden.Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.41.
3. Grotowski, J. In Barbara, E., & Brook, P.(1975). The Monk. U.K. Good Book Publishers.
4. Kubrick, S., King, S., Johnson, D., & Warner Bros. (1980). The Shining. Los Angeles, CA: Warner Bros.
5. Lim, Dennis (2015). David Lynch: The Man From Another Place. Amazon Publishing/New Harvest.
6. Mori, M. (2012). Translated by MacDorman, K. F.; Kageki, Norri. "The Uncanny Valley". IEEE Robotics and Automation. 19 (2): 98–100.
7. Mori, M. (1997). Das unheimliche Tal (K. F. MacDorman & V. Schwind, trans.). In K. D. Haensch, L. Nelke, & M. Planitzer (Eds.), Uncanny interfaces. p. 212.
8. N. Royle, (2003).The Uncanny. London. London University Press.p. 103. 
9. Rank, Otto.(1914). Will Therapy. New York, NY: Classic Book Publishers.
10. Shelley, M. (2004). Frankenstein. New York, NY: Fine Creative Media. 
11. Davis,. Womack, Kenneth. (2001). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Ed. Raman Selden.Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.41.
12. N. Royle, (2003).The Uncanny. London. London University Press.p. 103.