Journal Press India®

Impact of Mobile Intervention in Indian Agriculture

Vol 3, Issue 2, July - December 2016 | Pages: 1-15 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/manthan.v3i2.7874


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. Pooja Jain, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Delhi, India (poojajain@jimsindia.org)
2. * J. K. Goyal, Director, Jagan Institute of Management Studies, Delhi, India (jkgoyal@jimsindia.org)

The major challenge in India’s agricultural sector is to create and improve the existing agriculture infrastructure which can improve the livelihood of rural masses. Penetration of mobile phones in India in the last 10 years has grown tremendously. Many service providers have emerged as players in this market providing a portfolio of services to consumers. Mobile-enabled information services have been introduced in agri-business to empower farmers with updated information related to farming and marketing of agricultural produce. The objective of this paper is to explore the potential of mobile phones and mobile-enabled agricultural services in improving the agricultural performance of farmers. Farmers are benefiting from better access to information through mobile phones on seed variety selection, weather update, crop diseases and getting a better market price for their produce. Farmers equipped with information have a stronger bargaining position within existing trade relationships. The study adopted the constructs of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, self-efficacy, attitude of the respondent (farmer) and behavioural intention to measure mobile adoption behaviour of farmers in agriculture. Factor analysis and regression analysis are used to identify factors significantly affecting behavioural intention of adopting mobile technology and reach an effective conclusion.

Keywords

Mobile telephony; Agriculture; Information access; Behavioural intention

  1. Abrahm, R. (2007).  Mobile Phones and Economic Development: Evidence from the Fishing Industry in India. Information Technology and International Development 4 (1): 5-17.MIT Press.
  2. Aker, J.C. (2010). Dial ‘A’ for Agriculture: Using Information and Communication Technologies for Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.
  3. Bertolini, R. (2004). Making Information and Communication Technologies Work for Food Security in Africa, 2020. IFPRI Brief- Africa Conference, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington October 2004.
  4. Census of India. (2011). Census Report.
  5. Chandrashekhran, G.( 2002). Can Indian Agriculture become globally competitive? The Hindu Business Line. Internet edition.
  6. Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S. & Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7(5): 515-543.
  7. De Silva, H. & Ratnadiwakara.D. (2008). Using ICT to Reduce Transaction Costs in Agriculture through Better Communication: A Case-Study from Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: LIRNEasia.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319–339.
  9. Fox, J. W. (2002). Poverty in India since 1974: A Country Case Study. Technical Report, submitted to USAID/ Washington.
  10. Furuholt, B. & Matotay, E.( 2011). The developmental contribution from mobile phones across the agricultural value chain in rural Africa. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 48(7): 1–16.
  11. Houghton, D. (2009). Cell Phones and Cattle: The Impact of Mobile Telephony on Agricultural Productivity in Developing Nations. Honors Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfill of the Requirements for Graduation with Distinction in Economics in Trinity College of Duke University.
  12. IIahiane, H. (2011). Mobile phone use, bricolage and the transformation of social and economic ties of micro-entrepreneur in urban Morocco. International Journal of Business Anthropology, 2(1): 31-47.
  13. Inchauste, G., Olivieri, S., Saavedra, J., & Winkler, H (2012). What is behind the decline in poverty since 2000? Evidence from Bangladesh, Peru and Thailand. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6199, Washington, DC
  14. Jensen, M. (2000). African Internet Status. Retrieved from:
  15. http://www.africapolicy.org/docs00/inet0010.htm
  16. Kuo, Y.F., & Yen, S.N. (2009). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value added services. Computers in Human Behavior. 25 (1): 103-110.
  17. Labonne, J. & Chase, R.S. (2009). The power of information: the impact of mobile phones on farmers’ welfare in the Philippines. Policy Research Working Paper 4996, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  18. Leo, M. & Liu, M.C. (2006). ICT and agricultural productivity: Evidence from cross country data. Agricultural Economics. 34(3): 221.
  19. Mittal, S., Gandhi, S., & Tripath, G. (2010). Socio-Economic Impact of Mobile Phones on Indian Agriculture. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, February.
  20. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
  21. Pradhan, B.K. & Saluja, M.R.(1998). An assessment of poverty Studies in India with special reference to economic reforms. The Pakistan Development Review. 37(4): Part II.
  22. Ramaraju .G. V, Anurag. T.S., Singh, K. Hrishikesh & Kumar, S. (2011). ICT in agriculture: Gaps and way forward.  Information Technology in Developing Countries. 21(2).
  23. Rao, N.H. (2007). A framework for implementing information and communication technologies in agricultural development in India. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 74: 491–51.
  24. Rouvinen, P. (2006). Diffusion of digital mobile telephony: Are developing countries different. Telecommunications Policy. 30: 46-63.
  25. Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications9(3), 209-216.
  26. Varman, R., Skålén, P. & Belk, R.W. (2012). Conflicts at the bottom of the pyramid: Profitability, poverty alleviation, and neoliberal governmentality. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 31(1): 19-35.
  27. Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.
  28. World Bank. (2007). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  29. Zhang.J., Xiaoping, Z., Z., Zhang, .X.& Fu, Z.(2010). Farmers’ information acceptance behaviour in China. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 5(3): 217-221.
Abstract Views: 222
PDF Views: 60

News/Events

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.