Journal Press India®

MUDRA: Journal of Finance and Accounting
Vol 12 , Issue 2 , July - December 2025 | Pages: 51-69 | Research Paper

Efficiency Analysis of Large cap and ELSS funds in India-DEA Approach

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Preeta Varma, Research Scholar, Management, Calcutta University, kolkata, West Bengal, India (preeta1999@gmail.com)
2. Chinmoy Jana, Professor, Management, Calcutta University, kolkata, West Bengal, India (chinmoyjana@yahoo.com)
3. Soumitra Kumar Mallick, Professor, Management, Calcutta University, kolkata, West Bengal, India (sk_mallick@yahoo.com)

This study employs Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess the relative efficiency of 30 Indian equity mutual funds in the Large-Cap and Equity Linked Savings Scheme (ELSS) categories over the period 2018–2023. Efficiency is measured using four input variables-standard deviation, portfolio turnover ratio, beta (systematic risk), and expense ratio and one output variable, the Sharpe Ratio, representing risk-adjusted performance. The analysis identifies the most efficient funds within each category and provides directional benchmarks for improving underperforming funds. Findings reveal that ELSS funds exhibit a higher incidence of relative efficiency compared to Large-Cap funds. Specifically, efficiency improvements in Large-Cap funds require a significant reduction in portfolio turnover, whereas ELSS funds would benefit most from lower return volatility. These insights offer practical implications for investors, fund managers, and asset management firms seeking to optimize mutual fund performance in the Indian context.

Keywords

Mutual funds; Portfolio turnover; Expense ratio; DEA; ELSS

  1. Agarwal, P. & Sehgal, S. (2020). Efficiency analysis of Indian large-cap equity mutual funds using DEA. Global Business Review, 21(5), 1224–1243.
  2. Amihud, Y. & Goyenko, R. Y. (2013). Mutual fund’s R² as predictor of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 26(3), 667–694.
  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
  4. Barber, B. M., Odean, T. & Zheng, L. (2005). Out of sight, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows. Journal of Business, 78(6), 2095–2120.
  5. Basso, A. & Funari, S. (2001). A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(3), 477–492.
  6. Berk, J. B. & van Binsbergen, J. H. (2015). Measuring skill in the mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 118(1), 1–20.
  7. Bogle, J. C. (2014). The arithmetic of “all-in” investment expenses. Financial Analysts Journal, 70(1), 13–21.
  8. Busse, J. A., Goyal, A. & Wahal, S. (2010). Performance and persistence in institutional investment management. Journal of Finance, 65(2), 765–790.
  9. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
  10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
  11. Cremers, M., Ferreira, M., Matos, P. & Starks, L. (2016). Indexing and active fund management: International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(3), 539–560.
  12. Debasish, S. S. (2009). Investigating performance of equity-based mutual funds in Indian capital market. South Asian Journal of Management, 16(2), 44–60.
  13. Edelen, R. M., Evans, R. B. & Kadlec, G. B. (2013). Shedding light on “invisible” costs: Trading costs and mutual fund performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 33–44.
  14. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J. & Blake, C. R. (1996). The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 69(2), 133–157.
  15. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
  16. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22.
  17. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
  18. Ferson, W. E. & Lin, J. (2014). Alpha and performance measurement: The effect of investor disagreement. Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1565–1596.
  19. Galagedera, D. U. A. & Silvapulle, P. (2002). Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 60–73. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350210768021
  20. Goel, S. & Mani, M. (2018). Performance evaluation of mutual funds: An application of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Financial Management, 8(2), 1–10.
  21. Gregoriou, G. N., Sedzro, K. & Zhu, J. (2005). Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(2), 555–571.
  22. Guo, X., Phillips, G. M. & Stallaert, J. (2012). Does information and communication technology lead to the well-being of nations? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 20(2), 67–93.
  23. Gupta, R. & Sehgal, S. (2012). Impact of fundamental factors on mutual fund performance in India. Decision, 39(3), 1–19.
  24. Henriksson, R. D. (1984). Market timing and mutual fund performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business, 57(1), 73–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1086/29 6225
  25. Huang, J., Sialm, C. & Zhang, H. (2011). Risk shifting and mutual fund performance. Review of Financial Studies, 24(8), 2575–2616.
  26. Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2325404
  27. Jensen, M. C. (1969). Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios. Journal of Business, 42(2), 167–247. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1086/2951 82
  28. Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K. & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 408–418.
  29. Otten, R. & Bams, D. (2002). European mutual fund performance. European Financial Management, 8(1), 75–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00177
  30. Patel, R. & Sharma, M. (2021). Comparative efficiency of ELSS and diversified equity funds: A DEA approach. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 34(1), 1–11.
  31. Pollet, J. M. & Wilson, M. (2008). How does size affect mutual fund behavior? Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2941–2969.
  32. Sarkis, J. (2007). Preparing your data for DEA. In J. Zhu & W. D. Cook (Eds.), Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 305–320). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_14
  33. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138.
  34. Switzer, L. N. (2010). The behavior of small cap vs. large cap stocks in recessions and recoveries: Empirical evidence for the United States and Canada. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 21(3), 332–346. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2010.03.002
  35. Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 63–75.
  36. Tripathy, N. & Das, R. C. (2022). A comparative efficiency analysis of large-cap and mid-cap mutual funds: A DEA approach. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 294–312.
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 1

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.