Journal Press India®

ICT Enabled Smart Cities: A Wave of Amelioration

Vol 8 , Issue 1 , January - June 2021 | Pages: 134-150 | Perspective  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.pragati.v8i1.812108


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Richa Tiwari, Assistant professor, Department of Management , Nitee Meenakshi School of management , Bangalore, Karnataka, India (richa.1976@gmail.com)

‘Digital cities’ or ‘smart cities’ are the need of the day for they bring about an efficient administration and improved standard of living in the modern world. This paper focuses on the technological perspectives of a smart city; the perspectives which are an integral and vital component to give face to a smart city. Smart cities are developing gradually, and the stakeholders realize their needs, importance, and benefits on the quality of life. The planning and policymaking which incorporates the use of ICT will prove to be a game changer in the long run. The usage of technology and knowledge of it is very critical in the burgeoning of a smart city. One of these technologies is TAM (technology acceptance model) as it enhances and supports the smart city mission. This paper will follow a meta synthesis methodology to systematically analyze the concepts of various research papers based on their value contribution to the research topic.

Keywords

Smart city; Digital city; TAM (Technology Acceptance Model); Information and communications technology (ICT).

  1. Achimugu, P., Oluwagbemi, O., & Oluwaranti, A. (2010). An evaluation of the impact of ICT diffusion in Nigeria’s higher educational institutions. Journal of Information Technology Impact10(1), 25-34.
  2. Alawadhi, S., Aldama-Nalda, A., Chourabi, H., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Leung, S., Mellouli, S., & Walker, S. (2012, September). Building understanding of smart city initiatives. In International conference on electronic government (pp. 40-53). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  3. Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 1-16.
  4. Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities47, 95-106.
  5. Angelstam, P., Khaulyak, O., Yamelynets, T., Mozgeris, G., Naumov, V., Chmielewski, T. J., & Valasiuk, S. (2017). Green infrastructure development at European Union's eastern border: Effects of road infrastructure and forest habitat loss. Journal of Environmental Management193, 300-311.
  6. Anthopoulos, L. G., & Fitsilis, P. (2014). Smart cities and their roles in city competition: A classification. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR)10(1), 63-77.
  7. Audirac, I. (2003). Information-age landscapes outside the developed world Bangalore, India, and Guadalajara, Mexico. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 16-32.
  8. Bai, X. & Schandl, H (2011). Urban ecology and industrial ecology. In Douglas I, Goode D Houck m, Wang R (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology, pp. 26-37, Routledge.
  9. Bankole, F. O., Brown, I., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2011, May). The impact of ICT infrastructure on human development: An analysis of ICT-Use in SADC countries. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Kathmandu, Nepal. Reference Paper - Impact of ICT Infrastructure On Human Development
  10. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly31(1), 119-128.
  11. Baron, G., Brinkman, J., & Wenzler, I. (2012). Supporting sustainability through smart infrastructures: The case for the city of Amsterdam. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 8(2-3), 169-177.
  12. Barrionuevo, J. M., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2012). Smart cities, sustainable progress. Iese Insight, 14(14), 50-57.
  13. Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2012). Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration. Innovation, 14(4), 557-575.
  14. Bélissent, J. (2010). Getting clever about smart cities: New opportunities require new business models. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 193, 244-77.
  15. Bell, G., & Dourish, P. (2007). Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing are dominant vision. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing11(2), 133-143
  16. Beretta, I. (2018). The social effects of eco-innovations in Italian smart cities. Cities, 72, 115-121.
  17. Brockerhoff, M. (1999). Urban growth in developing countries: a review of projections and predictions. Population and Development Review, 25(4), 757-778.
  18. Brokerhoff, M., & Brennan, E. (1998). The poverty of cities in developing regions. Population and Development Review, 24(1), 75-114.
  19. Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Territorial capital and regional growth: Increasing returns in cognitive knowledge use (No. 09-059/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
  20. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., & Scholl, H. J. (2012, January). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2289-2297). IEEE
  21. Coffey, A., Beverley, H., & Paul, A. (1996). Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online, 1(1), 80-91.
  22. Cottica, A. (2010). Wikicrazia. Palermo: Navarra Editore
  23. Damaskopoulos, P. (2004). Network topography of the new economy: Organizational passages from knowledge to innovation. In social and economic transformation in the digital era (pp. 220-234). IGI Global. Panagiotis Damaskopoulos (INSEAD, France)
  24. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8), 982-1003.
  25. Deakin, M., & Al Waer, H. (2011). From intelligent to smart cities. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 140-152.
  26. Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2007). The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: Meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 414-430.
  27. Ferro, E., Caroleo, B., Leo, M., Osella, M., & Pautasso, E. (2013, May). The role of ICT in smart cities governance. In Proceedings of 13th international conference for E-democracy and open government. Donau-Universität Krems (pp. 133-145).
  28. Findlay, A. M., Li, F. L. N., Jowett, A. J., & Skeldon, R. (1996). Skilled international migration and the global city: A study of expatriates in Hong Kong. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49-61.
  29. Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? Architecture, City and Environment (ACE), 4(12), 7-26.
  30. Gigler, B. S. (2011). Informational capabilities-the missing link for the impact of ICT on development. Available at SSRN 2191594.
  31. Graham, S., Cornford, J., & Marvin, S. (1996). The socio-economic benefits of a universal telephone network: A demand-side view of universal service. Telecommunications Policy20(1), 3-10.
  32. Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., De Boer, Y., & Kok, M. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1651-1660.
  33. Han, M. J. N., & Kim, M. J. (2021). A critical review of the smart city in relation to citizen adoption towards sustainable smart living. Habitat International108, 102312.
  34. Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89-97.
  35. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303-320.
  36. Hudson, R. (2001, July). Regional development, flows of value and governance processes in an enlarged Europe. In Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, 27. International Centre for Regional Regeneration and Development Studies University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom July 2001.
  37. Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1999). The social construction of technology. The Social Shaping of Technology2, 113-115.
  38. Komninos, N. (2006). The architecture of intelligent cities. Intelligent Environments, 6, 53-61.
  39. Kowal, J., & Jasińska-Biliczak, A. (2016, June). Socio-demographic factors of innovative capacity of IT professionals in small regional enterprises in transition economies. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS 2016). 23-24th June  2016  Krakow, Poland.
  40. Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149-157.
  41. Maeng, D. M., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2004). Chicago and Seoul: A comparative study of the impact of information and communications technologies on urban land use and regulation. Journal of Urban Technology, 11(2), 61-92.
  42. Meso, P., Musa, P., Straub, D., & Mbarika, V. (2009). Information infrastructure, governance, and socio-economic development in developing countries. European Journal of Information Systems18(1), 52-65.
  43. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282-291). College Park Maryland USA 12 June, 2011- 15 June, 2011.
  44. Nijaki, L. K., & Worrel, G. (2012). Procurement for sustainable local economic development. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 25(2), 133-153.
  45. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.
  46. Qureshi, M. K., Jaleel, A., Patt, Y. N., Steely, S. C., & Emer, J. (2007). Adaptive insertion policies for high performance caching. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 35(2), 381-391.
  47. Sassen, S. (2013). Land grabs today: Feeding the disassembling of national territory. Globalizations, 10(1), 25-46.
  48. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign affairs, 28-41.
  49. Silk, M. L., & Andrews, D. L. (2006). The fittest city in America. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(3), 315-327.
  50. Söderström, O. (2016). From a technology intensive to a knowledge intensive smart urbanism. Beware of smart people, 63-69. Symposium Proceedings Berlin, June 19-20.
  51. Sui, D. Z. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems1(32), 1-5.
  52. Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
  53. Tafidis, P., Macedo, E., Coelho, M. C., Niculescu, M. C., Voicu, A., Barbu, C., Bandeira, J. (2017). Exploring the impact of ICT on urban mobility in heterogenic regions. Transportation Research Procedia27, 309-316.
  54. Talvitie, J. (2004). Incorporating the impact of ICT into urban and regional planning. European Journal of Spatial Development, 10, 1-32.
  55. Tayyaran, M. R., Khan, A. M., & Anderson, D. A. (2003). Impact of telecommuting and intelligent transportation systems on residential location choice. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(2), 171-193.
  56. Unit, E. I. (2010). Evaluating the environment for public–private partnerships in latin America and the Caribbean: The 2010 Infrascope: A guide to the index and methodology. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.
  57. Van Oorschot, J. A., Hofman, E., & Halman, J. I. (2018). A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 1-21.
  58. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science46(2), 186-204.
  59. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
  60. Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model? Australian Planner, 52(1), 27-34.
Abstract Views: 8
PDF Views: 4

Advanced Search

News/Events

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.