Published Online: June 18, 2017
Author Details
( * ) denotes Corresponding author
As a result of reforms, competition has led to the expansion of banking markets. With the entry of new private and foreign banks, the competition has affected the conduct of public sector banks. Our objective is to determine whether conduct of public sector reveals that there are strategic groups amongst Public Sector Banks. We have estimated the growth rates of the PSBs as a sector, as well as, two strategic groups, viz., SBI Group and Nationalised banks. Using paired t-test on the data for 1992 and 2016, we have compared the conduct of the two strategic groups, for four conduct variables. All four conduct variables, namely, advertising expenditure, operating expenditure, diversification, and investment in government securities show the presence of strategic groups amongst public sector banks. The paper also establishes that strategic groups are a part of conduct, not structure. It is well established through a set of t-test that in the case of public sector banks, strategic groups, to begin with, did not exist. However, with the emergence of competition, public sector banks chose to polarize as to distinct strategic groups through a process of dynamic formation of such groups namely, SBI group and Nationalised group. We establish through this paper that evolution of strategic groups amongst public sector banks have taken place over the time period.
Keywords
Diversification; Operational Expenditure; Product Differentiation; G-securities
Bhanumurthy, K.V. & Deb A.T. (2013). Theoretical framework of competition as applied to banking. International Journal of Banking, Risk and Insurance, 1(2), 1-16.
Biswas, P.K. & Deb A.T. (2004). Determinants of NPA in the Indian public sector banks. The ICFAI Journal of Bank Management, 3(12), 215-231.
Goyal, K.A. & Joshi, V. (2012). Indian banking industry: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Business Research and Management, 3(1), 18-28.
Hay, D. & Morris D. (1991). Industrial economics and organization: Theory and evidence. London: Oxford University Press.
Kannan, R., Narain A., & Ghosh S. (2001). Determinants of net interest margin under regulatory requirements- An econometric study. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(4), 337-344.
Newman, H. (1978). Strategic groups and the structure-performance relationship. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 60, 417-427.
Rajaraman, I. & Vasishth G. (2002). Non-performing loans of PSU Banks: Some panel results. Economic and Political Weekly, 27, 429-435.
Rajput, N. & Handa H. (2011). Banking efficiency: An application of DEA. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, 2(9), 65-71.
Ramashastri, A.S., Samuel A., & Gangadharan S. (2004). Income stability of Scheduled commercial banks: Interest vis-à-vis non-interest income. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(12), 1311-1319.
Verma, S. & Saini R. (2010). Impact of bank size on conduct of commercial banks in India. The Conference on Money and Finance in the Indian Economy, 25–26 February, IGIDR Mumbai. Retrieved from http://www.igidr.ac.in/money/mFundCost-12/Impact%20of%20bank%20size_satish%20verma_rohit.pdf.