Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Intergovernmental transfers are a major instrument to ensure smooth functioning of ‘Fiscal federalism’ in India. But the mechanism of Central transfers in India seems to be confusing and overlapping. Although a formula-based practice has been mandated by the Indian Constitution, there are several breaks in the practice. While predetermined formulas are used for some transfers, there is considerable discretion in allocating other classes of transfers. This paper makes an attempt to focus on the determinants that influence the quantum of discretionary transfer to sub-national governments from a political economy perspective. Taking a panel data set of 28 states for the period 2001 to 2011, and by using Arrellana-Bover (1995)/ Blundell-Bond (1998) system estimation model, the paper observes that the chosen variables do explain disparity in Central fund disbursement under non formulaic discretionary head in a robust way. The study has analysed the results separately for SCS and NSCS and in combine. The findings of the study reveal that the chosen variables have different outcomes for SCS and NSCS. However, when SCS and NSCS states are combined, the variables like fiscal capacity, fiscal performance and coalition status are found to be significant.

Keywords

Fiscal federalism; Discretionary transfer; Political economy; Dynamic Panel; Special category states

1. Arulampalam, W., Dhillon, A., Dasgupta, S., & Bhaskar, D. (2009). Electoral goals and centre state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India. TheJournal of Development Economics, 88(1), 103-119.
2. Arellano, M., & Bover. O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 29–51.
3. Biswas, R., Marjit, S., & Marimoutou, V. (2010). Fiscal federalism, state lobbying and discretionary finance: Evidence from India. Economic and Politics, 22(1), 68-91.
4. Blundell, R., & Bond, S.R. (1998). Initial condition and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1),115-143.
5. Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.). Non Stationary Panel, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, pp. 161-178. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Chakraborty, P., Mukherjee, N. A., & Amarnath, H.K. (2010). Interstate distribution of central expenditure and subsidies. Working Paper No 2010-66, NIPFP, New Delhi.
7. Chaubey, P.K. (2003). Fiscal federalism in India. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publication, Pvt. Ltd.
8. Dasgupta, S., Dhillon, A., & Dutta, B. (2004). Electoral goals and centre-state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India, Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.471.839&rep=rep1&type=pdf
9. Dash, B., & Raja, A. (2012). Political determinants of the allocation of public expenditures: A Study of the Indian states. Working Paper No. 2012-101, NIPFP, New Delhi.
10. Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1132-1155.
11. Khemani, S. (2003). Partisan politics and intergovernmental transfers in India. Working Paper No. 3016. Development Research Group, The World Bank.
12. Levin, A., Lin, F., & Chu, C. (2002): Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108,1-24.
13. Lindbeck, A., & Weibull, J. (1987). Balanced budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52(3), 273-297.
14. Nayak, C.,& Satpathy, P. (2017). Federal finance in India: An analysis of discretionary transfers. VISION: The Journal of Indian Taxation,4(1), 1-18.
15. Panda, P.K. (2016). Economic and political determinants of centre state fiscal transfer in India: A dynamic panel analysis of State level data. The Journal of Developing Areas,50(2), 329-347.
16. Rao, M. G., & Singh, N. (2000). The political economy of centre-state fiscal transfers in India. Paper presented at the Columbia University - World Bank conference on institutional elements of tax design and reform, February 18-19,2000. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2a70/ffd0ccba20d508b8d1889350d2d5d0952813.pdf
17. Report of the Sub-Group of Chief Ministers on Rationalisation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (2015). NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi
18. Riker, W. (1975). Federalism. In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, pp. 75-85, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
19. Singh, N., & Vasishtha, G. (2004). Some patterns in Center-state fiscal transfers in India: An illustrative analysis. NIPFP. SSCIE Working paper No.4-18,Santa Cruz Centre for International Economics: University of California. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2867/363038714b866d43c17a25b07ed93ef92a72.pdf