Journal Press India®

PRASTUTI: Journal of Management & Research
Vol 6 , Issue 2 , July - December 2017 | Pages: 39-42 | Research Paper

Impact of Performance Management System on the Organizational Performance: A Study of Private Banks

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Seema Rafique, Professor, SIRT, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Performance management system has become the backbone of any organization specifically in competitive industries like banking, pharmacy etc wherein increasing cut throat competition is new buzzword .and survival of the fittest has become the realities of the day. Poaching has emerged as latest employee recruitment strategy specifically in the today scenario wherein the banks end up paying 200% more than the previous company. The research paper therefore focuses on evaluation of effectiveness of performance management system and concurrently reviews both job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The present study therefore attempts to explore the relationship between effectiveness of performance management system and employee engagement and organizational commitment. Models adopted from Allen and Meyers commitment scale and Minnesota scale of satisfaction has been used for checking the satisfaction and commitment level and factorial based questionnaire adopted from- Giller and Moss, Brinkerhoff and Kant 1980; Cleveland, Murphy and William 1989 has been used to check the effectiveness of performance management systems. The findings suggest that there is significant correlation between performance management system and employee engagement satisfaction and moderate correlation between employee organizational commitments. Therefore to conclude we can have the finding that effective performance management system is only mantra to build the loyalty index of the employee to keep them happy as happy mind work best.

Keywords

Performance management system, efficacy, employee engagement, job satisfaction and organizational commitment.

  1. Barnett, R.C., & Hyde, J.S. (2001). “Women, men, work and family: An expansionist theory”. American Psychologist. pp 781-796.
  2. Blanco G. & Feldman L. (2000). “Home-making responsibilities and health of working women”, Universidad Central, Caracas, Venezuela, Salud Publica Mex. Vol 42(3). pp 217-225.
  3. Friedman S.D. & Greenhause J.H. (2000). “Work and family – Allies or enemies?” New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  4. Kaufman G. (2000). “Do Gender Role Attitudes Matter?: Family Formation and Dissolution Among Traditional and Egalitarian Men and Women”. Journal of Family Issues. vol 21(1). pp 128 – 144.
  5. Pasley K., Kerpelman J., and Guilbert D.E. (2001). “Gendered Conflict, Identity Disruption, and Marital Instability: Expanding Gottman's Model”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Vol 18(1). pp 5 – 27.
  6. Raj A. (2004). “Changing Gender Roles”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Vol.35.
  7. Stoeva, A. Z., Chui, R. K. and Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). “Negative affectivity, role stress, and work-family conflict”. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. pp 1-16.
Abstract Views: 10
PDF Views: 490

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.