Journal Press India®

Analysis of Portfolio Selection Model in Indian Stock Market

Vol 8 , Issue 2 , July - December 2021 | Pages: 57-78 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.mudra.v8i2.822104


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. Shubham Sah, Student, Department of Commerce, Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India (shubhamsah8759@gmail.com)
2. Amit Kundu, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Cooch Behar Panchanan Barma University, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India (prof.amitkundu@gmail.com)
3. * Anil Kumar Goyal, Associate Professor, Department of Management, MAIMS, Delhi, India (anilgoyal20@gmail.com)

A general issue that often arises among investors is the selection of optimum portfolio according to the desires and requirements of investors. Selecting optimum portfolio is the process of determining the best combination of securities and their weights with the aim of maximizing the expected return and minimizing the volatility. In this article fifteen companies from Indian stock market have been chosen for the analysis. Standard deviation has been used for measuring the risk of portfolios and excel based financial model has been proposed to get the optimum portfolio. In search of better expected return, portfolios have created consisting of initial fifteen stocks, ten stock and five stocks respectively. The result of the analysis indicates that the combination of fifteen stocks gives lower expected return than a combination of ten stocks and five stocks. Further, the portfolio with fewer stocks has higher risk compared to the portfolio with more stocks.  Thus the optimum portfolio consisting of five stocks gives the highest expected return of 34.403 with increment in level of risk.

Keywords

Expected return; Risk; Sharpe ratio; Portfolio; Modern portfolio theory; Stock market.

  1. Basak, S., & Shapiro, A. (2001). Value-at-risk based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices. Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 371-405.
  2. Bawa, V. S., & Lindenberg, E. B. (1977). Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 189-200. 
  3. Calvo, C., Ivorra, C., & Liern, V. (2018). Controlling risk through diversification in portfolio selection with non-historical information. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(10), 1543-1548.
  4. Cohen, K. J., & Pogue, J. A. (1967). An empirical evaluation of alternative portfolio-selection models. The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, 40(2), 166–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351987.
  5. Del Guercioa, D., Genc, E., & Tran, H. (2018). Playing favorites: Conflicts of interest in mutual fund management. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3), 535-557.
  6. Grinblatt, M., & Saxena, K. (2018). When factors do not span their basis portfolios. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(6), 2335-2354.
  7. Hooda, D.S. & Stehlik, M. (2011), Portfolio Analysis of Investments in Risk Management. Open Statistics and Probability Journal, 3, 21-26.
  8. Kalayci, C. B., Ertenlice, O., & Akbay, M. A. (2019). A comprehensive review of deterministic models and applications for mean-variance portfolio optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 125(1), 345-368.
  9. Lester, A. (2019). On the theory and practice of multifactor portfolio. The Journal of Portfolio Management Quantitative, 45(3), 87-100.
  10. Maheshwari, A., & Sarantsev, A. (2018). Modeling financial system with interbank flows, borrowing, and investing. Risks, 6(4), 131.
  11. Mandelbrot, B. (2004). The (Mis)behavior of markets. New York: Basic Books.
  12. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection: Journal of Finance. 6(1952), 77–91.
  13. Oliinyk, V. (2017). Optimal management of the enterprise's financial flows. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(6), 1875-1883.
  14. Post, T., Karabatı, S., & Arvanitis, S.(2018). Portfolio optimization based on stochastic dominance and empirical likelihood. Journal of Econometrics, 206(1), 167-186.
  15. Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443-1471.
  16. Roy, A. D,(1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20(3), 431–49, https://doi.org/10.2307/1907413. 
  17. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, 39(1), 119–38, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2351741.
  18. Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49-58.
  19. Tobin, J, (1958), Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205.
  20. Uhl, M. W. & Rohner, P. (2018). The compensation portfolioFinance Research Letters, 27(C), 60-64.
Abstract Views: 22
PDF Views: 6

Advanced Search

News/Events

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

Institute of Managem...

Deccan Education Society Institute of Management Development and Re...

S.B. Patil Institute...

Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust's S.B. Patil Institute of Mana...

D. Y. Patil IMCAM, A...

D. Y. Patil Institute of Master of Computer Applications & Managem...

Vignana Jyothi Insti...

Vignana Jyothi Institute of Management International Conference on ...

Department of Commer...

Department of Commerce, Faculty of Commerce & Business, University...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.