Journal Press India®

VISION: Journal of Indian Taxation
Vol 13 , Issue 1 , January - June 2026 | Pages: 69-103 | Research Paper

The Architecture of Indirect Tax Reform: A Comparative Analysis of India’s GST within the Global VAT Framework

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Pragnesh Dave, Professor, Chemistry, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat, India (pragnesh7@yahoo.com)
2. Monika Devrani, Research Scholar, Law, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India (monikapdave@gmail.com)
3. Neepa Vyas, Associate Professor, Law, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India (pragneshdave@rediffmail.com)

This paper examines the conceptual foundations and comparative architecture of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) as a transformative fiscal reform within the global evolution of value-added taxation. Drawing upon theories of fiscal federalism, optimal taxation, and comparative legal institutionalism, the study situates India’s dual GST model within the broader discourse on tax harmonization and cooperative federalism. It critically evaluates the constitutional framework of Articles 246A, 269A, and 279A, the design of the GST Council, and the legal implications of digital governance through the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN). Employing a mixed-methods approach integrating doctrinal, comparative, and empirical analysis, the paper benchmarks India’s GST against VAT systems in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, and the European Union. Findings suggest that while GST has enhanced revenue visibility and reduced cascading effects, challenges persist regarding multi-rate complexity, compliance costs, and intergovernmental coordination. The study concludes that achieving simplicity, equity, and constitutional sustainability requires rationalized rate structures, strengthened institutional accountability, and robust digital safeguards. By offering an integrated analytical framework, this research contributes to contemporary debates on fiscal reform and legal governance in emerging federal economies.

Keywords

Goods and Services Tax (GST); Fiscal Federalism; Comparative Taxation; Value Added Tax (VAT); Tax Governance; Legal Institutional Reform

  1. Auerbach, A. J. & Hines, J. R. Jr. (2002). Taxation and economic efficiency. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1347–1421). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)03006-6
  2. Basu, D. D. (2021). Constitutional remedies and Writs By Durga Das Basu (2 Volumes).
  3. Bird, J. M., & Markle, R. S. (2012). Subjective well‐being in school environments: Promoting positive youth development through evidence‐based assessment and intervention. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 61–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01127.x
  4. Bird, R. M., & Gendron, P. P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619442
  5. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2018). Taxation and development: What have we learned from fifty years of research? World Development, 105, 1-13.
  6. Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency. American Economic Review, 61(1), 8–27.
  7. Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J. P., & Summers, V. (2001). The Modern VAT. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
  8. Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law (Rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
  9. Grant Thornton International Ltd. (2025). IFRS example consolidated financial statements 2025. Retrieved from https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/ifrs-example-consolidated-financial-statements-2025/
  10. GSTN (2024). Retrieved from https://taxbykk.com/gst-circulars-issued-in-2024-3/?srslt id=AfmBOoq5WP7y1ha9kClbyuuDWCg-BfxFLjdnMR8NdjMwMs_n8di_nKWc#elemen tor-toc__heading-anchor-0
  11. International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook, April 2023: A rocky recovery. Washington, DC.
  12. Keen, M. (2022). Taxing times: The world of public finance through the eyes of the IMF. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513584975.071
  13. Keen, M. & Lockwood, B. (2010). The value-added tax: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 138–151. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeve co.2009.01.012
  14. Mukherjee, K. (2015). Vertical Integration Strategy. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management - Volume 12 Strategic Management (eds C. L. Cooper, J. McGee and T. Sammut‐Bonnici). Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 12. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/97811187 85317.WEOM120180
  15. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy. McGraw–Hill.
  16. Nikolova, M., & Cnossen, F. (2020). What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it. Labour Economics, 65, 101847. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.labeco.2020.101847
  17. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  18. OECD (2023). Tax administration 2023: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/0f4250ba-en
  19. OECD (2024). OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2024 Issue 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  20. OECD (2024). OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2024 Issue 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  21. OECD (2025), OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2025 Issue 2: Resilient Growth but with Increasing Fragilities, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9f653ca1-en
  22. Patnaik, I., & Sengupta, R. (2022). Analyzing India’s exchange rate regime. India Policy Forum, 18(1), 53-85.
  23. Rao, J. N. K., & Fuller, W. A. (2017). Small area estimation at 50: Achievements and challenges. Survey Methodology.
  24. Sengupta, D. & Rao, S. J. (2019). Linear models and regression with R - An integrated approach. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1142/11282
  25. Sengupta, D., & Jammalamadaka, S. R. (2019). Linear models and regression with R: An integrated approach. World Scientific Publishing.
  26. Shah, A. (2020). Fiscal federalism and the GST in India: Evolving a cooperative model. In R. Rao & P. K. Jha (Eds.), India’s goods and services tax: Design, implementation and impact (pp. 45–73). Routledge India. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036307
  27. Mundle, S. & Sengupta M. (2022). Fiscal performance of the Central government and the States of India. Retrieved from https://www.nipfp.org.in/publications/working-papers/2015/
  28. World Bank (2023). World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  29. World Bank (2025). World development report 2025: Standards for development. World Bank.
  30. Zweigert, K. & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Primary Legal and Institutional Sources

  • Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC). (2024). GST revenue data portal. Government of India. https://cbic-gst.gov.in
  • Constitution of India, 101st Amendment Act, 2016. (2016). Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1.
  • Goods and Services Tax Council (India). (2025). Minutes and recommendations archive. Government of India. https://gstcouncil.gov.in
  • Union of India v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd., (2022) SCC OnLine SC 657 (Supreme Court of India).
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 3

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.